2005
DOI: 10.1162/1063614053714126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kepler's Move from Orbs to Orbits: Documenting a Revolutionary Scientific Concept

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He replaced the old concept of orbs (i.e. spherical shells), to which the planets were attached, with the revolutionary concept of orbit, that is, the path of the planet in space governed by physical laws (Goldstein and Hon, 2005). These laws, however, are not what were later called Kepler’s three laws of planetary motion.…”
Section: Commentaries On ‘The Status Of Models In Ancient and Medievamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He replaced the old concept of orbs (i.e. spherical shells), to which the planets were attached, with the revolutionary concept of orbit, that is, the path of the planet in space governed by physical laws (Goldstein and Hon, 2005). These laws, however, are not what were later called Kepler’s three laws of planetary motion.…”
Section: Commentaries On ‘The Status Of Models In Ancient and Medievamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many historians have recently pointed out that the real revolutionary figure in this revolutionary change was Kepler, and the key achievement of the so-called Copernican revolution consists in transforming theoretical astronomy from one that was understood in terms of ORB to one that was understood in terms of ORBIT (Barker, 1990;Barker & Goldstein, 1998;Goldstein & Hon, 2005). From antiquity to the 16th century, astronomy was built on a specific ontology that attached planets to spherical shells called orbs.…”
Section: Philosophical Psychology 497mentioning
confidence: 99%