2016
DOI: 10.2744/ccb-1189.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kemp's Ridley Sea Turtle Saga and Setback: Novel Analyses of Cumulative Hatchlings Released and Time-Lagged Annual Nests in Tamaulipas, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 228 publications
(285 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disturbingly, Kemp's ridleys have failed to meet projected nesting numbers since 2010, and re covery of this species to historic numbers has slowed in recent years (Caillouet et al 2016). Future monitoring of nesting and other abundance measures may yield insight into possible population-level effects of the DWH spill, but limitations should be anticipated due to difficulty in disentangling spill effects from other anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disturbingly, Kemp's ridleys have failed to meet projected nesting numbers since 2010, and re covery of this species to historic numbers has slowed in recent years (Caillouet et al 2016). Future monitoring of nesting and other abundance measures may yield insight into possible population-level effects of the DWH spill, but limitations should be anticipated due to difficulty in disentangling spill effects from other anthropogenic and non-anthropogenic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is evidence that the Kemp’s ridley re-migration interval increased from 2008 to 2016 and was approximately 3.5 years in the time period 2014 to 2016 [46]. Changes in remigration intervals due to decreased foraging resources, density-dependent effects, and/or changes in environmental conditions have been proposed as possible factors underlying the recent reduction in Kemp’s ridley nest numbers [47]. Given relatively short reproductive longevity, delayed remigration could result in fewer nests overall during each female’s reproductive lifetime and a decrease in number of observed nests for the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Juvenile Kemp’s ridleys inhabit foraging areas both in the GOM and along the US Atlantic coast and questions have been raised regarding potential differences in somatic growth rates between the regions, as these have implications for differing ASMs and relative contributions to the reproductive population [13, 47, 50, 61]. Although some growth data have indicated that juvenile somatic growth rates in the GOM are higher, others suggest the converse is true [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The species recovered through a combination of domestic and international actions including establishing a bi-national working agreement between the U.S. and Mexico to increase the protection of nesting females, hatchlings, and eggs (Márquez Millan, Olmeda, Sánchez, & Díaz, 1989;Woody, 1989), prohibition of trawling in GoM waters offshore of Rancho Nuevo, the primary nesting beach in Mexico, during the nesting season (Márquez Millan et al, 1989), a reintroduction program, with a head-starting component, designed to form a secondary nesting colony at Padre Island National Seashore, Texas (Caillouet, Shaver, & Landry, 2015;Fletcher, 1989;, and gradual implementation of turtle excluder devices (TEDS) on U.S. shrimping vessels in the GoM (Turtle Expert Working Group [TEWG], 2000). Positive population growth was observed from the 1980s until 2010 (Caillouet, 2011;Crowder & Heppell, 2011;Gallaway et al, 2013), when annual nesting numbers dropped by 35.4% (Caillouet, Gallaway, & Putman, 2016). A decline in nesting numbers was evident in 2013 and 2014 (Caillouet, 2014;Caillouet et al, 2015), and the overall population was predicted to be decreasing by 5% per year (Heppell, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%