“…These include pathways that result in functional increases in presynaptic output due to increased SV pools, increased presynaptic Ca 2+ influx, or enhanced membrane excitability. Numerous pathways that control structural plasticity and regulation of AZ number at Drosophila NMJs have also been identified, including Neurexin/Neuroligin, Teneurins, neurotrophins, Synaptotagmin 4-mediated retrograde signaling, BMPs, Wingless, and regulated proteolysis ( Wan et al, 2000 ; Aberle et al, 2002 ; Marqués et al, 2002 ; DiAntonio and Hicke, 2004 ; Yoshihara et al, 2005 ; Ataman et al, 2006 , 2008 ; Collins et al, 2006 ; Collins and DiAntonio, 2007 ; Li et al, 2007 ; Johnson et al, 2009 ; Wairkar et al, 2009 ; Banovic et al, 2010 ; Sun et al, 2011 ; Miller et al, 2012 ; Mosca et al, 2012 ; Owald et al, 2012 ; Berke et al, 2013 ; Korkut et al, 2013 ; Piccioli and Littleton, 2014 ; Harris and Littleton, 2015 ; Muhammad et al, 2015 ; Harris et al, 2016 ; Banerjee et al, 2017 ; Ulian-Benitez et al, 2017 ). Defining if and how these well-known molecular pathways for synaptic growth and function are uniquely employed in tonic vs. phasic motoneurons should complement RNA profiling approaches and help decipher how differences in synaptic structure and function arise.…”