Many complex systems around us can be represented as networks [26,151,29,97,66,30,55,29,149]. Usually, nodes represent basic parts of an interacting system, while links or edges correspond to possible relevant interactions. In some cases, this seems a natural way to look at the system; e.g. people use the phrase social network to refer to relations among individuals in a self-evident way nowadays. Also, in many cases, the notation of nodes and links has a direct physical meaning e.g. when considering transportation or communication networks [169,137,206]. In other cases, the network representation is more abstract, e.g. interaction among proteins in a cell can be analyzed from a network perspective [25,110]. A common aspect is then that network topology can be a relevant factor in the dynamics of the complex system; thus, researchers of diverse fields can benefit from common results in many cases. Also, the network representation can help by giving results for the constraints of the behavior of a system made up of parts interacting in possibly complex ways [13,9,10,14,102,29]. While networks have been a focus of interest from mathematicians since decades -often referred to as graphs [130] -the topic gained more widespread attention in the last two decades, fueled by the availability of network datasets in several diverse fields of interest. Notable examples include biochemistry, where possible interactions among a very large number of organic molecules were explored with new, high-throughput methods [110,25]; information technology where efficient operation of networked devices is an important goal [137,158,206,82], sociology where obtaining largescale information on social relations among individuals is just becoming a reality [142,50,116]; or finance, where the structure of relations among banks and firms can have a strong impact on the stability of the economy [46,43,42,173,156]. In many of these cases, one can hope that the network representation grasps the fundamental structure of the studied system, giving a valuable tool to researchers for performing analysis.Apart from conceptual similarities, many networks obtained from diverse sources share common aspects in their structure. These include low-density or sparseness (only a small fraction of possibilities is present), small average diameter, heterogeneous degree distributions, relatively high clustering [124,151]. On the other hand, there are still significant differences, e.g. in assortativity [150,66,25], fractality [181,182], spectral properties [72,82], community structure [155,116] or relative abundance of motifs [112,131,11]. Assessing the relevance of the differences can then help in better understanding the network structure and its relation to dynamics of the studies complex system [35,166,171,179,7].