Keeping Safe on Australian Roads: Overview of Key Determinants of Risky Driving, Passenger Injury, and Fatalities for Indigenous Populations

Abstract

Social and cultural barriers associated with inequitable access to driver licensing and associated road safety education, as well as socioeconomic issues that preclude ongoing vehicle maintenance and registration, result in unsafe in-car behaviours such as passenger overcrowding. This in turn is associated with improper seatbelt usage, noncompliance with child restraint mandates, and driver distraction. For example, in Australia, where seatbelt use is mandatory, Indigenous road users are three times less likely to wear seatbelts than non-Indigenous road users. This is associated with a disproportionately high fatality rate for Indigenous drivers and passengers; 21% of Indigenous motor-vehicle occupants killed on Australian roads were not wearing a seatbelt at the time of impact. In addition, inequitable access to driver licensing instruction due to financial and cultural barriers results in Indigenous learner drivers having limited access to qualified mentors and instructors. A consequent lack of road safety instruction results in a normalising of risky driving behaviours, perpetuated through successive generations of drivers. Moreover, culturally biased driver instruction manuals, which are contextualised within an English written-language learning framework, fail to accommodate the learning needs of Indigenous peoples who may encounter difficulties with English literacy. This results in difficulty understanding the fundamental road rules, which in turn makes it difficult for young drivers to develop and sustain safe in-car behaviours. This paper considers the literature regarding road safety for Indigenous road users and critically evaluates strategies and policies that have been advanced to protect Indigenous drivers. Novel solutions to increasing road safety rule compliance are proposed, particularly in relation to passenger safety, which are uniquely embedded within Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing. Safe driving practices have crucial health and social implications for Indigenous communities by allowing more Indigenous people to participate in work and education opportunities, access healthcare, maintain cultural commitments, and engage with families and friends, qualities which are essential for ongoing health and wellbeing.

Road traffic fatalities in rural and remote Australia from 2006 to 2017: The need for targeted action

“…Epidemiological studies have shown MVC fatality risk for Australian demographic groups is variable when it comes to age, 23,24 sex, 25 and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status. 26 Contrary to standardised mortality ratios derived from 1997 to 1996 data, our results indicate that females in rural areas are at a significantly higher risk of fatal crashes in comparison with their metropolitan counterparts than males. 25 The influence of duration and frequency of road travel on the differences in relative risk between gender groups is unknown and cannot be determined by our data.…”

Exploring the Impact of Driver Adherence to Speed Limits and the Interdependence of Roadside Collisions in an Urban Environment: An Agent-Based Modelling Approach

“…These trends are evident outside of the UK. According to [3], almost half of the reported driving offences in the Northern Territory of Australia are regulatory; these include speeding and non-adherence to road rules. In Norway, a longitudinal study conducted on 145 young drivers (up to 25 years old) found that speeding behaviour was the main factor (80%) in causing motor vehicle collisions [4].…”

Unravelling the road safety challenges: A spatial analysis of road fatalities rates

“…Most studies that delves into the determinants of road fatalities do not account for spatial interactions (Ali et al, 2019;Dhibi, 2019;Saeednejad, et al, 2020;Pammer, et al 2021;Prada, 2021). Erdogan (2009) used Geographic Weighted Regression (GWR) to investigate road mortality across Turkish provinces in 2003, examining death rates alongside vehicle counts separated by their type, such as cars and buses.…”