Keeping confidence: HIV and the criminal law from HIV service providers’ perspectives

Abstract

We present qualitative research findings about how perceptions of criminal prosecutions for the transmission of HIV interact with the provision of high-quality HIV health and social care in England and Wales. Seven focus groups were undertaken with a total of 75 diverse professionals working in clinical and community-based services for people with HIV. Participants’ understanding of the law in this area was varied, with many knowing the basic requirements for a prosecution, yet lacking confidence in the best way to communicate key details with those using their service. Prosecutions for HIV transmission have influenced, and in some instances, disrupted the provision of HIV services, creating ambivalence and concern among many providers about their new role as providers of legal information. The way that participants approached the topic with service users was influenced by their personal views on individual and shared responsibility for health, their concerns about professional liability and their degree of trust in non-coercive health promotion approaches to managing public health. These findings reveal an underlying ambivalence among many providers about how they regard the interface between criminal law, coercion and public health. It is also apparent that in most HIV service environments, meaningful exploration of practical ethical issues is relatively rare. The data presented here will additionally be of use to managers and providers of HIV services in order that they can provide consistent and confident support and advice to people with HIV.

Alternatives to sharing COVID-19 data with law enforcement: Recommendations for stakeholders

“…Providing someone a single opportunity to refuse re-disclosures upon diagnosis is not equivalent to affirmative consent for specific re-disclosures. [ 59 ] (p412) The Minnesota protocol’s COVID-19 screening procedure is an example of providing people with an opportunity to disclose at a specific moment in time, when asked by a 911 operator.…”

Anti-Homosexual Legislation and HIV-Related Stigma in African Nations: What Has Been the Role of PEPFAR?

“…For example, an early PEPFAR strategy through USAID (the Action for West Africa Region, AWARE program) was to promote model omnibus HIV legislation in HIV-affected countries, using 'best practice' discourse [32,33]. Between 2005 and 2010, 18 countries in West and Central Africa adopted versions of this model law that included provisions criminalizing transmission of HIV [34], despite evidence such criminalization promotes HIV stigma and other harms [5,[35][36][37][38]. This model legislation is no longer promoted by PEPFAR, given the preponderance of evidence that criminalization may make HIV epidemics worse.…”

A Review of Empirical Studies on the Views on the Criminalisation of STIs/HIV Transmission in the UK

“…The four studies among community and health staff highlighted the lack of legal guidance and discussion about the criminalisation of HIV transmission [49,53,54]. Professionals experienced difficulty as a result of regulations relating to internal policies, an emphasis on informing the patients and insisting patients disclosed to potential partners.…”