2018
DOI: 10.1108/bfj-03-2017-0128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Keep on grazing: factors driving the pasture-raised milk market in Germany

Abstract: Purpose The percentage of dairy cows managed in grazing systems in Northwest Europe is on the decline, even though pasturing is perceived favourably as enhancing the health and welfare of dairy cows. With consumers turning away from intensively produced food, developing the pasture-raised milk market could encourage farmers to continue keeping their cows on pastures. To provide insights for expanding this specialty milk market, the purpose of this paper is to, therefore, investigate the roles of personal, prod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So, pasture-raised products were positively associated with better animal welfare, higher product quality and benefits to human health [26]. The obstacles cited by participants to the purchase of pasture-raised products, such as low availability, perceived associated costs, and low self-efficacy, correspond to earlier findings [34,35]. The willingness of some participants to change their own habits to support environmental protection and animal welfare suggests there is potential for marketing pasture-raised products to relatively broad consumer segments, as earlier found by Weinrich et al [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, pasture-raised products were positively associated with better animal welfare, higher product quality and benefits to human health [26]. The obstacles cited by participants to the purchase of pasture-raised products, such as low availability, perceived associated costs, and low self-efficacy, correspond to earlier findings [34,35]. The willingness of some participants to change their own habits to support environmental protection and animal welfare suggests there is potential for marketing pasture-raised products to relatively broad consumer segments, as earlier found by Weinrich et al [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For many consumers, however, it may prove difficult to change their consumption habits and behavior, despite their understanding the competitive disadvantages arising for farmers from the adoption of pasture grazing, stricter animal welfare standards, and biodiversity conservation measures [32,33]. Consumers' behavior regarding pasture-raised products from the new grazing system is likely to be affected by factors, such as sense of own self-efficacy, social norms, feelings, and cognition, as well as perceived personal benefits, personal relation to food production, the associated costs of the products, and their availability [34][35][36][37][38][39]. Addressing at least some of these factors using effective targeted communication and appealing visual and textual materials can increase the inclination of consumers to consciously perceive and process information on pasture-raised products and their propensity toward pro-environmental behavior [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the organic markets, knowledge [71], trust [72], pesticide concerns [73], willingness to pay [74] and subjective norms [75] and interrelationships with the consumer attitudes toward organic food are highlighted by these documents with better centrality metrics. In addition, food safety concerns [76], prices and availability are considered as barriers for a more sustainable food consumption [77] and the skepticism about health claims [78] are reinforced. The level of education has its influence on knowledge concerning organic foods [79].…”
Section: Contributions To Literature From the Top 40 Most Relevant Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khalid (2021) [103] 1.00 Boobalan (2021) [95] 0.95 Nijssen (2021) [106] 0.84 Li (2020) [99] 0.77 Hansmann (2020) [98] 0.74 Teng (2015) [72] 0.69 Chen (2007) [38] 0.68 [80] 0.67 Gassler (2018) [77] 0.66 Ahmad (2019) [83] 0.65 Chen (2008) [88] 0.65 Vega-Zamora (2018) [105] 0.64 Chang (2017) [89] 0.63 Yazar (2019) [93] 0.63 [81] 0.62 Bravo (2013) [92] 0.61 Dowd (2013) [96] 0.60 Singh (2017) [75] 0.60 Chang (2019) [102] 0.59 Verneau (2014) [94] 0.58 Jorge (2020) [97] 0.58 Hsu (2016) [76] 0.58 Nystrand (2020) [100] 0.58 Aitken (2020) [84] 0.57 Liang (2020) [104] 0.57 Yarimoglu (2019) [101] 0.56 Aertsens (2011) [53] 0.56 Rankin (2018) [86] 0.55 [91] 0.55 Dentoni (2014) [85] 0.55 De Magistris (2008) [55] 0.55 Fernqvist (2014) [54] 0.55 Lopez-Galan (2013) [79] 0.55 Hoque (2018) [82] 0.54 Kim (2020) [87] 0.54 Cheung (2015) [71]…”
Section: Documents Eigenvector Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The components of the conceptual model, which were examined by PLS-SEM, were chosen based on the factors mentioned in articles that discuss consumer attitudes, motives and purchase behaviour in connection with dairy products and also, based on our own presuppositions in regard to the special case of sour cream imitations (Table I). As it was revealed in several studies, the price of the products (“PRICE”), consumer experiences and the thereby perceived price-value ratio (“VALUE”), knowledge (“KNOW”) and consciousness (“CONSC”), nutritional awareness (“NUTR”) and sensory properties (“SENS”) all have effects on the choice the consumer makes when buying a dairy product (Grunert et al , 2000; Kurajdová et al , 2015; Bakke et al , 2016; Gassler et al , 2017; Rahnama and Rajabpour, 2017); therefore, we set up six constructs for these factors. The general attitude of customers related to a certain food item might have an impact on the purchase of another product in the same food category (Song and Im, 2018).…”
Section: Conceptual Model and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%