2019
DOI: 10.21105/joss.01566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

kdensity: An R package for kernel density estimation with parametric starts and asymmetric kernels

Abstract: It is often necessary to estimate a probability density non-parametrically, that is, without making strong parametric assumptions such as normality. This R (R Core Team, 2019) package provides a non-parametric density estimator that can take advantage of some of the knowledge the user has about the probability density. Kernel density estimation (Silverman, 2018) is a popular method for non-parametric density estimation based on placing kernels on each data point. Hjort & Glad (1995) extended kernel density est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the average of the individual indices , with k being the number of previously conducted studies. We implemented this procedure as a kernel density estimation with a Gaussian kernel and a non-parametric bandwidth selector ( Moss and Tveten, 2019 ), so that the number of bins does not have to be chosen a priori.…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the average of the individual indices , with k being the number of previously conducted studies. We implemented this procedure as a kernel density estimation with a Gaussian kernel and a non-parametric bandwidth selector ( Moss and Tveten, 2019 ), so that the number of bins does not have to be chosen a priori.…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The H‐BK approach has been implemented by means of the kdensity()function included in the kdensity package (Moss and Tveten, ). The C‐BK method has been implemented through the chen99Kernel()function contained in the bde package (Santafe et al ., ).…”
Section: Real Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= = 0, in our case). We 588 approximated the posterior probability at this collapse-point by smoothing our posterior 589 samples for = with a beta-kernel density estimator(Moss and Tveten, 2019). We interpret 590 the strength of significance for Bayes factors as proposed byJeffreys (1961), requiring at 591 least 'Substantial' support (BF > 3) to select the more complex model ( = > 0).592 593 RESULTS 594 support for the = > 0 model, while ∼32% of those replicates qualified as Substantial 601 support or greater.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%