2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8049-9_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KDamper Concept for Base Isolation and Damping of High-Rise Building Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous work of KDamper [32][33][34][35][36][37], an additional mass of 5% is efficient. In an effort to make the device more realistic and easier to implement, mD is selected as 0.1% of the structure mass.…”
Section: Optimization Constraints and Limitations Based On Engineering Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to previous work of KDamper [32][33][34][35][36][37], an additional mass of 5% is efficient. In an effort to make the device more realistic and easier to implement, mD is selected as 0.1% of the structure mass.…”
Section: Optimization Constraints and Limitations Based On Engineering Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposed by Antoniadis et al [22], the KDamper exploits the advantages of the aforementioned concepts, incorporating appropriate stiffness and mass elements, which include a NS element. The KDamper has been examined for the protection of bridge structures [23][24][25][26][27], Wind Turbines [28,29] and structural systems [30,31]. In addition, the KDamper is effectively implemented as an Absorption Base (KDAB) in the bases of structures [32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead of increasing the additional mass, the vibration isolation capability of the KDamper can be increased by increasing the value of the negative stiffness element, overcoming the sensitivity problems of TMDs as the tuning is mainly controlled by the negative stiffness element's parameters. Thus, the KDamper always indicates better isolation properties than a TMD with the same additional mass, finding numerous applications for vibration absorption of structural systems [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Although the KDamper incorporates a negative stiffness element, it is designed to be both statically and dynamically stable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of increasing the additional mass, the vibration isolation capability of the KDamper can be increased by the NS, overcoming the sensitivity problems of TMDs as the tuning is mainly controlled by the NS. Thus, the KDamper always indicates better isolation properties than a TMD with the same mass, finding numerous applications for vibration absorption in structural systems [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Although the KDamper incorporates a NS element, it is designed to be statically and dynamically stable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%