tensivists in Malaysia, Europe and North America recognize futile treatment and apply care restrictions widely. We have shown previously that these decisions were influenced by family ethnicity, religious beliefs and paediatrician bias (3). This current study concurs with Martinot's findings that severity of illness, such as the PRISM score and the extent of multiple organ dysfunction, was poorly predictive of the modes of death. Despite recognizing that quality of life assessments were important in end-of-life decisions, it appears that pre-existing handicap was not associated with the use of care limitation. Factors that influence end-of-life decision-making are increasingly recognized. However, severity of illness and pre-existing functional status could not be used to predict the different end-of-life events in critically ill children. We agree with the authors that the next step is to study the ethical processes leading to care restrictions and investigate international differences in the application of such orders.
References