1973
DOI: 10.4153/cjm-1973-077-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kasteleyn's Theorem and Arbitrary Graphs

Abstract: Familiarity with the basic notions of graph theory is assumed. Loops and multiple edges are not permitted. An orientation of an edge e of a graph G is a designation of one of the ends of e as the positive end and the other as the negative end. We say that e is oriented from the positive end to the negative end. If e joins vertex v to vertex w and v is the positive end of e, we write e = (v, w). An orientation of G is a set of orientations, one for each edge of G; a graph with an orientation is called a directe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former property implies that the latter is independent of the orientation of H. (See Lemma 2.8.) The following lemma is proved in [2]. Lemma 2.2.…”
Section: A Structure Theorem For Minimal Non-pfaffian Near Bipartite mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The former property implies that the latter is independent of the orientation of H. (See Lemma 2.8.) The following lemma is proved in [2]. Lemma 2.2.…”
Section: A Structure Theorem For Minimal Non-pfaffian Near Bipartite mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let P be a directed A _ B-arc. Then there exist i, j # [1,2] such that P is included in a minimal path Q directed from y i to x j .…”
Section: Forbidden a _ B-arcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(We write (u, w) for an edge of G* directed from vertex u to vertex w .) Associate with f t a plus sign if [2] Pfaffian property 249 and a minus sign otherwise. Thus the signs of the 1-factors are dependent on the choice of / , , but it is clear that the resulting partition of F into two complementary subsets is not.…”
Section: Pfaffian Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A special case is implicit in the work of Fisher [16] and Temperley and Fisher [55]. Different proofs may be found in [25], [26], [32], [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%