2002
DOI: 10.1080/00087114.2002.10589278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyotypic studies in Lycium section Mesocope (Solanaceae) from South America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same was observed here for the diploid southern African Lycium and the diploid South American species (STIEFKENS and BER-NARDELLO 1996;2000;2002;. However, in 3 diploid Asian species two satellited pairs have been reported (SHIEDAI et al 1999;DONGLI et al 2000), similar to the observations of the tetraploid species in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The same was observed here for the diploid southern African Lycium and the diploid South American species (STIEFKENS and BER-NARDELLO 1996;2000;2002;. However, in 3 diploid Asian species two satellited pairs have been reported (SHIEDAI et al 1999;DONGLI et al 2000), similar to the observations of the tetraploid species in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…MILLER and VENABLE (2000) suggested that gender dimorphism in Lycium evolves following polyploidy, which acts as a trigger for the transition to dimorphism because it disrupts the pre-existing self-incompatibility system. Indeed, among North American Lycium, diploid species are self-incompatible (MILLER and VENABLE 2002;YEUNG et al 2005;SAVAGE and MILLER 2006), whereas the hermaphroditic mating type in polyploid species appears to be self-compatible (MILLER and VENABLE 2000;2002). In southern Africa, gender dimorphism is more advanced than in the New World, and all dimorphic species are dioecious; thus, the self-compatibility status of the polyploid taxa is diffi cult to determine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations