2003
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-96.4.1237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyotypic and Molecular Identification of Laboratory Stocks of the South American Fruit Fly <I>Anastrepha fraterculus</I> (Wied) (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Abstract: The taxonomic status of the tephritid pest Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.) is a controversial subject, mainly because of misinterpretation of the observed genetic variation. In this work, the different karyotypes and DNA polymorphism of a geographically defined population from Northeastern Argentina were studied, using derived stocks maintained in the laboratory during 25 generations. The karyotypes were analyzed using C-banding and N-banding techniques, while DNA analysis was performed through the DNA polymera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the fragment size were not detected in a previous ITS1 analysis of Argentinian samples [52]. If only the size of the amplified fragment had been considered herein, we would also have found no relevant differences between the samples, but the scenario is quite different when the sequences of such fragments are considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Differences in the fragment size were not detected in a previous ITS1 analysis of Argentinian samples [52]. If only the size of the amplified fragment had been considered herein, we would also have found no relevant differences between the samples, but the scenario is quite different when the sequences of such fragments are considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…N-banding was obtained as described in Ref. [11]. At least 10 metaphase plates per chromosome spread were analyzed.…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%