2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyotype variability in KP1(+) and KP1(−) strains of Trypanosoma rangeli isolated in Brazil and Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T. rangeli presents an extensive genetic variability demonstrated by kDNA and nuclear DNA analysis (7,9,11,12). Moreover, analysis of the karyotype profiles permitted the division of the T. rangeli strains into two groups coinciding with the KP1+ and KP1− genotypes (13). Subsequent studies clearly showed host-parasite specific associations between T. rangeli-Rhodnius spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…T. rangeli presents an extensive genetic variability demonstrated by kDNA and nuclear DNA analysis (7,9,11,12). Moreover, analysis of the karyotype profiles permitted the division of the T. rangeli strains into two groups coinciding with the KP1+ and KP1− genotypes (13). Subsequent studies clearly showed host-parasite specific associations between T. rangeli-Rhodnius spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, the subtelomeric region of T. rangeli contains genes of the gp85/TS superfamily that presents sialidase activity (Añez-Rojas et al 2005) and might be involved in attachment of the parasite to the salivary glands of the vector (Peña et al 2009). Furthermore, analysis of the telomeric and subtelomeric regions of T. rangeli may contribute to the elucidation of the mechanisms that are responsible for the karyotype variability observed in this parasite (Henriksson et al 1996;Cabrine-Santos et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different molecular methods have been used for the genetic characterization of T. rangeli (Vallejo et al 2002;Marquez et al 2007;Cabrine-Santos et al 2009). T. rangeli populations can be divided into two groups, called KP1(+) and KP1(−), according to the presence or absence of KP1 minicircles in their kDNA, respectively (Vallejo et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFGE was performed in a BioRad CHEF Mapper system, as previously described (7) with pulses of 6V/cm and 46.47s for 33h 36 min. Analysis of chromosomal bands shared between clonal lineages and parental strains was conducted with the GelCompar II Program (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium) with the following conditions: Dice (Opt.1.00%) (Tol 1.0%-1.0%) (H>0.0% S>0.0%)[0.0%-100.0%].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epimastigote forms of T. cruzi (strains Y, JG, and RN1) and T. rangeli (strains P07 and SO29) (7) were maintained by passaging in LIT medium (4) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum. These were incubated at 28ºC in a biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) incubator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%