2016
DOI: 10.1159/000450534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyotype and Mapping of Repetitive DNAs in the African Butterfly Fish <b><i>Pantodon buchholzi, </i></b>the Sole Species of the Family Pantodontidae

Abstract: The monophyletic order Osteoglossiformes represents one of the most ancestral groups of teleosts and has at least 1 representative in all continents of the southern hemisphere, with the exception of Antarctica. However, despite its phylogenetic and biogeographical importance, cytogenetic data in Osteoglossiformes are scarce. Here, karyotype and chromosomal characteristics of the lower Niger River population of the African butterfly fish Pantodon buchholzi, the sole species of the family Pantodontidae (Osteoglo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we cannot exclude the incidence of chromosomal variation among P. afer populations, or even that another Papyrocranus species, P. congoensis , has been analyzed instead. In fact, a similar inconsistency was also found for another osteoglossiform species, butterfly fish, Pantodon buchholzi , in which 2n = 46 occurs in individuals from the lower Niger River basin [ 19 ], compared to uncertain chromosome numbers (2n = 46 or 48) previously reported by [ 22 ] for individuals of unknown origin. Interestingly, the karyotype of P. afer possess 2n = 50, i.e., chromosome number hypothesized as basal and/close to 2n for teleosts [ 55 ], and as compared to karyotypes of all other notopterids, also contains bi-armed elements in karyotype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we cannot exclude the incidence of chromosomal variation among P. afer populations, or even that another Papyrocranus species, P. congoensis , has been analyzed instead. In fact, a similar inconsistency was also found for another osteoglossiform species, butterfly fish, Pantodon buchholzi , in which 2n = 46 occurs in individuals from the lower Niger River basin [ 19 ], compared to uncertain chromosome numbers (2n = 46 or 48) previously reported by [ 22 ] for individuals of unknown origin. Interestingly, the karyotype of P. afer possess 2n = 50, i.e., chromosome number hypothesized as basal and/close to 2n for teleosts [ 55 ], and as compared to karyotypes of all other notopterids, also contains bi-armed elements in karyotype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In this line, karyotype investigations were coupled with analysis of genetic distance based on high-resolution sequencing data, and biogeographic analyses may provide further powerful insight into such problems. Although it constitutes a particular model for biogeographic and evolutionary studies [ 4 , 6 , 18 ], the cytotaxonomy of representatives within the order Osteoglossiformes is still insufficiently known, with most of the available data predating the development of modern molecular cytogenetic approaches [ 19 , 20 ]. These traditional data are restricted to the determination of diploid chromosome numbers (2n) and the basic karyotype descriptions of several representatives of all main Osteoglossiformes’ lineages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…: [ 89 , 123 125 ]), with our study adding the first records for Cypriniformes. About half of the surveyed teleost fish species exhibits a single pair of U2-bearing chromosomes and internal or proximal chromosomal localization [ 89 , 105 , 124 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sequences were selected from a pool of microsatellite repeats since they are commonly accumulated in several fish genomes (e.g. Nanda et al, 1990;Vanzela et al, 2002;Martins, 2007;Cioffi et al, 2011;Cioffi and Bertollo, 2012;Poltronieri et al, 2014;Cioffi et al, 2015;Pucci et al, 2016;Ráb et al, 2016;Sassi et al, 2019;Supiwong et al, 2019) We performed at least three repetitions for each experiment and analyzed at least 30 metaphases per experiment to check the consistency of the results. Images were captured using an Olympus BX50 microscope (Olympus Corporation, Ishikawa, Japan) with CoolSNAP and processed using Image-Pro Plus 4.1 software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%