2017
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201702092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyopherins regulate nuclear pore complex barrier and transport function

Abstract: Kapinos et al. show that nuclear pore complex permeability and cargo release functionalities are concomitantly regulated by karyopherin occupancy and turnover in a systematic continuum. This highlights increasingly important roles for the soluble nucleocytoplasmic transport machinery that depart from established views of the nuclear pore complex selectivity mechanism.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
113
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
12
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We fitted a single Langmuir isotherm to the saturation points, see Figure 2c, and thus obtained a binding affinity of -= 191 ± 20 nM (error is S.D.). This value compares very well tovalues for the binding between Kap95 and native FG-Nups as found with similar techniques, which typically range between 100 and 500 nM 18,27 . For reference, we similarly measured the affinity of Kap95 to Nsp1, a native FG-Nup from yeast, as well as to Nsp1-S, a Nsp1-mutant where the hydrophobic amino acids F, I, L, V are replaced by the hydrophilic amino acid Serine (S), which serves as a negative control since it is expected to not bind Kap95 due to the lack of FG repeats 14,15 (Figure 2d,g).…”
Section: Qcm-d Experiments and MD Simulations Show Selective Bindingsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We fitted a single Langmuir isotherm to the saturation points, see Figure 2c, and thus obtained a binding affinity of -= 191 ± 20 nM (error is S.D.). This value compares very well tovalues for the binding between Kap95 and native FG-Nups as found with similar techniques, which typically range between 100 and 500 nM 18,27 . For reference, we similarly measured the affinity of Kap95 to Nsp1, a native FG-Nup from yeast, as well as to Nsp1-S, a Nsp1-mutant where the hydrophobic amino acids F, I, L, V are replaced by the hydrophilic amino acid Serine (S), which serves as a negative control since it is expected to not bind Kap95 due to the lack of FG repeats 14,15 (Figure 2d,g).…”
Section: Qcm-d Experiments and MD Simulations Show Selective Bindingsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…That the Kap95 to NupX and Nsp1(-S) binding constants were found using different fits (single component vs. two-component Langmuir isotherms, respectively) can be attributed to differences between NupX and Nsp1 in terms of their respective ratios of ' and : . In previous work 18,46 , sparsely grafted FG domains ( ' > : ) revealed a single type of binding when interacting with Impβ (Kap95 human homolog) molecules, as opposed to closely-packed FG domains ( ' < : ) that instead showed two binding modes. Following this reasoning, the use of a two-component isotherm for the Nsp1(-S) brushes would be consistent with these and other previous studies 17,18 , since : (7.9 ± 2.0 nm for Nsp1, 6.8 ± 1.6 nm for Nsp1-S; errors are S.D.…”
Section: Qcm-d Experiments and MD Simulations Show Selective Bindingmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those might also enable a quantitative comparison between the permeability barrier properties of hydrogels versus liquid droplets under same conditions. Recent studies have suggested an integral role of NTRs as part of the permeability barrier (Kapinos et al, 2017; Lowe et al, 2015). Microrheology measurements could also investigate the permeability barrier properties over material states to assay if the presence of NTRs affect the molecular architecture of the droplet.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mediates NLS-NC-FG Nup Interactions. Multivalent interactions between Kaps and FG Nups facilitate selective transport across the NPC (40). We ascertained the binding of Kapα•Kapβ1•NLS-NCs to three FG Nups (cNup98, cNup214, and cNup153) by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) (SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Kapα•kapβ1mentioning
confidence: 99%