1978
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a108927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyological analysis of the Horsfield's shrew from peninsular India

Abstract: The chromosome complement of the Horsfield's shrew, Crocidura horsfieldi (Soricidae--Insectivora) was studied and the diploid number established to be 2n = 38. Comparisons were made with other species of the genera.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, Imaizumi (1961) Crocidura watasei is endemic to the Amami and the Okinawa Groups, occurring on 14 islands (Motokawa,199Sb Abe et al, 1994). However, because it's chromosomal number Qn=26, Harada et al,L985) is distinct from that of C. horsfteldii (2n=38, Krishna Rao & Aswathanarayana, 1978), it is obvious that C. watasei is actually a separate species endemic to the central Ryukyus (Motokawa et al, 1996).…”
Section: Northern Ryukyusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Imaizumi (1961) Crocidura watasei is endemic to the Amami and the Okinawa Groups, occurring on 14 islands (Motokawa,199Sb Abe et al, 1994). However, because it's chromosomal number Qn=26, Harada et al,L985) is distinct from that of C. horsfteldii (2n=38, Krishna Rao & Aswathanarayana, 1978), it is obvious that C. watasei is actually a separate species endemic to the central Ryukyus (Motokawa et al, 1996).…”
Section: Northern Ryukyusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we suspect that C. horsfieldii kurodai from Taiwan is also a unique species, which may or may not be closely related to the C. horsfieldii groups, so we will refer to it as C. kurodai. Indeed, the karyotype of C. kurodai is different from that of C. horsfieldii indochinensis (2n = 38 and FN = 48; Rao & Aswathanarayana, 1978) and C. horsfieldii watasei (2n = 26 and FN = 52; Harada et al, 1985). Reumer & Meylan (1986) consider C. horsfieldii watasei a distinct species, C. watasei, based on chromosomal features alone.…”
Section: Karyotypementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Fang et al (1997) re-evaluated C. h. kurodai as a unique species, C. kurodai, on the basis of differences in karyotype and morphology between samples from central Taiwan and south India. Chromosome numbers and the fundamental number of C. kurodai and C. hors®eldii are reported as 40 and 54 (Fang et al, 1997), and 38 and 48 (Rao & Aswathanarayana, 1978), respectively. Meanwhile, samples of tadae have been too few for reasonable analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%