Kapselendoskopie in der Diagnostik von Dünndarmerkrankungen

May, A.; Albert, JG; Keuchel, Martin; Moog, G.; Hartmann, Dirk

doi:10.1055/s-0029-1245788

Cited by 10 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers (PM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) have undergone CE without clinical sequel. The endoscopy section of the German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) recommends informed consent about the formal contraindication [1]. According to the guidelines of the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) CE is not contraindicated in patients with PMs or ICDs [2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Cardiac Pacemakers, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators, and Left Heart Devices: A Review of the Current Literature

Bandorski

Keuchel

Brück³

et al. 2011

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Study Aims. Capsule endoscopy is an established tool for investigation of the small intestine. Because of limited clinical experience in patients with cardiac devices, the Food and Drug Administration and the manufacturer recommended not to use capsule endoscopy in these patients. The vast majority of investigations did not reveal any interference between capsule endoscopy and cardiac devices. Methods. Studies investigating interference between CE and cardiac devices were analysed. For the review we considered studies published in English or German and indexed in Medline, as well as highly relevant abstracts. Results. In vitro and in vivo studies mainly revealed no interference between capsule endoscopy and cardiac devices. Technical data of capsule endoscopy (Given Imaging) reveal that interference with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillator is impossible. Telemetry can interfere with CE video. Conclusion. The clinical use of capsule endoscopy (Given Imaging) is unproblematic in patients with cardiac pacemakers.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Cardiac Pacemakers, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators, and Left Heart Devices: A Review of the Current Literature

Bandorski

Keuchel

Brück³

et al. 2011

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In clinical practice, VCE is usually used as the first diagnostic approach to the small bowels, enabling localization and assessment of the bleeding site, and can then be followed by BAE for endoscopical haemostasis [14]. Hereby, VCE can deliver important information whether to prefer an ante- or retrograde BAE.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Small Bowel Pleomorphic Liposarcoma: A Rare Cause of Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Nennstiel

Mollenhauer

Schlag

et al. 2014

Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The adequate assessability of the mucosa for the small intestine video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and capsule colonoscopy depends on the preparation [85] and correlates with the diagnostic effect. The preparation regime and the evaluation systems of individual studies vary.…”

Section: Quality Indicators/parameters For Specific Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A complete small intestine capsule endoscopy is defined as its arrival at the cecum during the examination time [85]. The rate of incomplete examinations is 10-25% [89].…”

Section: Quality Indicators/parameters For Specific Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality Assurance in Endoscopy: Which Parameters?

Denzer

2016

Visc Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The verbalisation of quality standards and parameters by medical societies are relevant for qualitative improvement but may also be an instrument to demand more resources for health care or be a unique characteristic. Within the health care system 3 different quality levels can be defined: structure, process and result quality. Methods: The current S2k guideline of the German Society for Gastroenterology (quality requirements for gastrointestinal endoscopy) AWMF registry no. 021-022 provides recommendations based on the available evidence for the structure quality (requirements for equipment, human resources) as well as for the process quality (patient preparation, conduct, documentation) and result quality (follow-up of specific endoscopic procedures). Results: Based on these recommendations, measurable quality indicators/parameters for the endoscopy have been selected and formulated. General quality parameters for endoscopic examinations are given as well as quality parameters for specific procedures for the preparation, conduct, and follow-up of specific endoscopic interventions. Conclusion: Only the regular review of processes and courses by means of defined measurement parameters builds up the basis for corrections based on facts. In addition, the implementation of recommended standards may be an instrument in demanding more resources from the health care system and, therefore, should be embedded as routine.

show abstract

Kapselendoskopie in der Diagnostik von Dünndarmerkrankungen

Cited by 10 publications

References 57 publications

Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Cardiac Pacemakers, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators, and Left Heart Devices: A Review of the Current Literature

Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Cardiac Pacemakers, Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators, and Left Heart Devices: A Review of the Current Literature

Small Bowel Pleomorphic Liposarcoma: A Rare Cause of Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Quality Assurance in Endoscopy: Which Parameters?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About