Kants Lehre der Antinomien „scheint mir den ganzen Geist seines Systems zu enthalten“ – Anmerkungen zu Hölderlin und Hegel und ein Rekurs auf Fichte

Waibel, Violetta L.

doi:10.1515/9783110365061-003

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Year Published

2020

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Book2

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In altra direzione su questo punto si muove l'interpretazione diWaibel (2015) che individua nella terza antinomia della ragione pura e più in generale nelle antinomie della Critica della ragion pura il termine di riferimento delle affermazioni di Hölderlin.…”

unclassified

Teleology as a way to religion. Hölderlin and the antinomy of judgement

Santini

2022

aisthesis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper discusses Hölderlin’s reading of the Kantian antinomy of the faculty of judgement from a letter to Hegel in January 1795. Its meaning is first explored in relation to a kind of distinctiveness that Hölderlin recognizes to the solution of the antinomy, to the point of considering it the place where the entire spirit of the Kantian system comes to the fore. Secondly, the prototypical role of the antinomy of the faculty of judgement for the other antinomies is shown according to a feature they share in the way in which they are solved. The aim of the paper is to bring out the distinctive feature of Hölderlin’s theoretical confrontation with the Critique of teleological judgement as a task and orientation of Hölderlin’s philosophical commitment itself, which understands Kant’s efforts from a different perspective than the one of his contemporaries.

show abstract

unclassified