Kant’s Nonideal Theory of Politics

Huseyinzadegan, Dilek

doi:10.2307/j.ctvdtphp4

Cited by 24 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1 For other work in this vein, see Mills (2017), Huseyinzadegan (2019), andLu-Adler (2023). 2 For the former approach, see Allais (2016); for the latter, see Lu-Adler (2023).…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Response to Critics: Kant’s Theory of Labour

Pascoe

2024

Kantian rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Elvira Basevich, Martin Sticker, and Helga Varden offered generative criticism of my monograph, Kant’s Theory of Labour. In this response, I explore how the resources they offer for thinking about gender, labour, and the state’s responsibility to ensure the material conditions of freedom can deepen both our attentiveness to patterns of systemic injustice in Kant’s political philosophy, and the resources Kant offers for addressing contemporary patterns of intersectional and material injustice.

show abstract

“…1 For other work in this vein, see Mills (2017), Huseyinzadegan (2019), andLu-Adler (2023). 2 For the former approach, see Allais (2016); for the latter, see Lu-Adler (2023).…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Response to Critics: Kant’s Theory of Labour

Pascoe

2024

Kantian rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…“If we demand of a principle that it should also be able to serve as the determinant of a universal legislation, this presupposes that it already has content; and if this content were present, it would be easy to apply the principle” (Hegel, 1962, §135; Hegel, 1977, pp. 256–62; see also Huseyinzadegan, 2019, pp. 10–15).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

What is a black radical Kantianism without Du Bois? On method, principle, and abolition democracy

Basevich

2023

Journal of Social Philosophy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kant's Theory of Labour

Pascoe

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This Element examines Kant's innovative account of labour in his political philosophy and develops an intersectional analysis of Kant. By demonstrating that Kant's analysis of slavery, citizenship, and sex developed in inter-linked ways over several decades, culminating in his development of a 'trichotomy' of Right, the author shows that Kant's normative account of independence is configured through his theory of labour, and is continuous with his anthropological accounts of race and gender, providing a systemic justification for the dependency of women and non-whites embedded in his philosophy of right. By examining Kant's arguments about slavery as intertwined with his account of domestic labour, the author argues that his ultimate rejection of slavery may owe more to his changing conceptualization of labour than to his theory of race, and that his final arguments against slavery rehearse strategies for embedding intersectional patterns of domestic dependence in his account of the rightful state.

show abstract

Kant’s Nonideal Theory of Politics

Cited by 24 publications

References 0 publications

Response to Critics: Kant’s Theory of Labour

Response to Critics: Kant’s Theory of Labour

What is a black radical Kantianism without Du Bois? On method, principle, and abolition democracy

Kant's Theory of Labour

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About