2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52914-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kant in Imperial Russia

Abstract: the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The beginning of reforms after Russia's defeat in the Crimean War coincided with the beginning of the neo-Kantian movement that influenced a number of Russian academic philosophers (e.g. 3 Among the most important are the books and articles by Nina Dmitrieva (2007;2022a;2022b), Leonard Kalinnikov (20052008), Alexey Krouglov (2009;2012a;2012b;2020a;2020b), Nelly Motroshilova (2006), Thomas Nemeth (2017), Vladimir Zhuchkov (1994, as well as articles by Anatoly Akhutin (1990) and Sergey Chernov (1994). In terms of methodology, this essay, somewhat unusually for Kantian studies, proceeds not by conceptual and textual analysis, nor by the logical construction of arguments, but by the study of metaphors (Blumenberg 2011(Blumenberg [1960; Lakoff and Johnson 1980) and social and "sociotechnical" imaginaries (Castoriadis 1997(Castoriadis [1975; Taylor 2003; Jasanoff and Kim 2015) -modes of thinking that in Russian history, and perhaps in history as such, have no less dramatic consequences than logical reasoning.…”
Section: Kant As An Enigma -And a Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beginning of reforms after Russia's defeat in the Crimean War coincided with the beginning of the neo-Kantian movement that influenced a number of Russian academic philosophers (e.g. 3 Among the most important are the books and articles by Nina Dmitrieva (2007;2022a;2022b), Leonard Kalinnikov (20052008), Alexey Krouglov (2009;2012a;2012b;2020a;2020b), Nelly Motroshilova (2006), Thomas Nemeth (2017), Vladimir Zhuchkov (1994, as well as articles by Anatoly Akhutin (1990) and Sergey Chernov (1994). In terms of methodology, this essay, somewhat unusually for Kantian studies, proceeds not by conceptual and textual analysis, nor by the logical construction of arguments, but by the study of metaphors (Blumenberg 2011(Blumenberg [1960; Lakoff and Johnson 1980) and social and "sociotechnical" imaginaries (Castoriadis 1997(Castoriadis [1975; Taylor 2003; Jasanoff and Kim 2015) -modes of thinking that in Russian history, and perhaps in history as such, have no less dramatic consequences than logical reasoning.…”
Section: Kant As An Enigma -And a Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В 2017 и 2022 гг. вышли в свет две значительные работы американского исследователя: о восприятии идей И. Канта в царской России [2] и о русском неокантианстве, которые обеспечили Т. Немету место одного из ведущих исследователей русского неокантианства в англоязычной научной среде.…”
unclassified
“…Кроме этого, смысл высказывания Г. Шпета (из «Очерка о развитии русской философии», 1922 г. ), выбранного Т. Неметом в качестве эпиграфа для книги «Кант в Имперской России» о том, что «философия приобретает национальный характер не в ответах -научный ответ для всех народов и языков -один, а в самой постановке вопросов, в подборе их, в частных модификациях» [2], также справедлив и для сочинения о русском неокантианстве. Преемственность и связь двух этих исследований состоит в выборе персоналий и в некотором пересечении в плоскости исторического времени.…”
unclassified
“…About the evolution of the concepts of biosphere-noosphere in Vernadsky's thought see[17, p. 82-89] 9. The letter was first published only in 1984 10.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%