Kant and Feminist Political Thought, Redux: Complicity, Accountability and Refusal

Huseyinzadegan, Dilek; Pascoe, Jordan

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13123-3_3

Cited by 13 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…14 See Varden (2020) for an argument that beautifully explores this option. 15 See Huseyinzadegan and Pascoe (2023) for an elaboration of this argument.…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Response to Critics: Kant’s Theory of Labour

Pascoe

2024

Kantian rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Elvira Basevich, Martin Sticker, and Helga Varden offered generative criticism of my monograph, Kant’s Theory of Labour. In this response, I explore how the resources they offer for thinking about gender, labour, and the state’s responsibility to ensure the material conditions of freedom can deepen both our attentiveness to patterns of systemic injustice in Kant’s political philosophy, and the resources Kant offers for addressing contemporary patterns of intersectional and material injustice.

show abstract

“…14 See Varden (2020) for an argument that beautifully explores this option. 15 See Huseyinzadegan and Pascoe (2023) for an elaboration of this argument.…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Response to Critics: Kant’s Theory of Labour

Pascoe

2024

Kantian rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Kant, Race, and Racism

Lu‐Adler

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kant scholars have paid relatively little attention to his raciology. They assume that his racism, as personal prejudice, can be disentangled from his core philosophy. They also assume that racism contradicts his moral theory. This book challenges both assumptions. It shows how Kant’s raciology—divided into racialism and racism—is integral to his philosophical system as a whole. It also rejects the individualistic approach to Kant and racism. Instead, it uses the notion of racism as ideological formation to demonstrate how Kant, from his social location both as a prominent scholar and as a lifelong educator, participated in the formation of modern racist ideology. As a scholar, Kant developed a groundbreaking scientific theory of race from the standpoint of a philosophical investigator of nature or Naturforscher. As an educator, he transmitted denigrating depictions of the racialized others and imbued them with normative relevance. In both roles, he presented a worldview that excluded nonwhites from such goods as recognitional respect and candidacy for cultural and moral achievements. Some effects of this worldview are still palpable today. Scholars who research and teach Kant’s philosophy therefore have an unshakable burden to take part in the ongoing antiracist struggles, through their teaching practices as well as their scholarship. And they must do so in a color-conscious as opposed to colorblind way, with a pragmatic attention to nonideal social realities and a clear normative orientation toward substantial racial justice, equality, and inclusion.

show abstract

Copyright Page

Lu-Adler

2023

Kant, Race, and Racism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Kant and Feminist Political Thought, Redux: Complicity, Accountability and Refusal

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

Response to Critics: Kant’s Theory of Labour

Response to Critics: Kant’s Theory of Labour

Kant, Race, and Racism

Copyright Page

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About