1952
DOI: 10.2307/3626277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kansas Phytopathological Notes: 1950

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of native telial hosts in supporting effective inoculum production and, hence, serving as inoculum reservoirs for the dispersal of airborne urediniospores, is also unknown. To our knowledge, no studies to date have examined the inoculum-producing potential, or susceptibility, of known telial hosts of P. emaculata other than switchgrass (Johnston et al 1952;Gustafson et al 2003;Uppalapti et al 2013). Moreover, given its range of telial hosts and large geographic distribution, studies into the winter survival of P. emaculata are also warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of native telial hosts in supporting effective inoculum production and, hence, serving as inoculum reservoirs for the dispersal of airborne urediniospores, is also unknown. To our knowledge, no studies to date have examined the inoculum-producing potential, or susceptibility, of known telial hosts of P. emaculata other than switchgrass (Johnston et al 1952;Gustafson et al 2003;Uppalapti et al 2013). Moreover, given its range of telial hosts and large geographic distribution, studies into the winter survival of P. emaculata are also warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%