Emerging Research in Computing, Information, Communication and Applications 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2553-9_43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kannpos-Kannada Parts of Speech Tagger Using Conditional Random Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pos tagger developed by the author achieved an accuracy of 92.8% (Pallavi and Pillai, 2015) and the new NP chunker with 95.32% accuracy was developed for the task were used to improve Kannada NER system. The system was trained using pos and chunk information in the beginning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pos tagger developed by the author achieved an accuracy of 92.8% (Pallavi and Pillai, 2015) and the new NP chunker with 95.32% accuracy was developed for the task were used to improve Kannada NER system. The system was trained using pos and chunk information in the beginning.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…POS tagger using CRFs has been developed. There are three noun categories (common noun, proper noun, location) in the pos tagset (Pallavi and Pillai, 2015) which helped to identify named entities. Often, NE is always represented as a proper noun.…”
Section: Features Used For Kannada Ner Posmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In SVM based POS tagging, multi-class classification is tackled by taking one POS tag at a time as a positive class, and the rest as negative (Fernando et al 2016). Conditional Random Fields (CRF) (Lafferty, McCallum, and Pereira 2001) are used to build probabilistic models that are able to segment and label the sequence data (Pallavi and Pillai 2014), and are in fact random fields globally conditioned on the observations that might range over natural sentences (Lafferty, McCallum, and Pereira 2001). They are often used in various natural language processing tasks (e.g.…”
Section: Lemmatizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also inflexible to the evolution of the language. K. P. Pallavi and Anitha S. Pillai [4] also use CRFs for POS tagging. They develop a tagger using an 80,000-word corpus created from Kannada Wikipedia.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%