Kajian Laik Fisik Sanitasi Dan Kualitas Mikrobiologis Depot Air Minum (DAM) Dibawah Program Pembinaan Dan Pengawasan Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara

Abstract

Determining category of physical appropriateness of DWS under health office development and controlling program of Hulu Sungai Utara Regency, Determining Microbiology quality of DWA under health office development and controlling program of Hulu Sungai Utara Regency, analyzing the correlation of physical appropriateness and microbiology quality if DWS under health office development and controlling program of Hulu Sungai Utara Regency. This is a quantitative study using cross-sectional research design in which the research was conducted in a certain period of time, the location of research was in 10 service area of the public health center in 9 subdistricts under health office development and controlling program of Hulu Sungai Utara Regency. It was found that 30 DWS (Drinking Water Storehouse) is under health office development and controlling program of Hulu Sungai Utara Regency, DWS which categorized as physically not Appropriate (TLF) was 20 DWS (66,7%) and categorized as physically appropriate (LF) was 10 DWS (33,3%). Microbiology quality of Balangan, Tabalong, Negara, Tangkawang and Rantau Bujur Darat River were excess the standard of quality of class I intended for the drinking water source. Microbiology quality of water source (PDAM) from 30 samples, it was found that 14 samples (46,7%) contained Coliform and E. coli, there were 2 samples (6,7%) contained only Coliform. Quality of microbiology and water product of 30 DWS, it was found that 2 DWS contained Coliform, all water of DWS production did not contain E.coli. Statistical test of the correlation of physical appropriateness and microbiology quality of river water cannot be conducted because all samples have the same category which is TMS so that there was no difference in result data of category determination. There was no significant difference between physical appropriateness with microbiology quality of Coliform (p=0,260) and E.coli (p = 0,235) raw water of DWS. There was no significant correlation of physical appropriateness with microbiology quality of Coliform (p = 0,540) water product of DWS, meanwhile for statistical test for correlation of physical appropriateness and microbiology quality of E.coli of water product cannot be conducted because there was no difference in result data of category determination so that all samples has the same category.

Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Kualitas Biologis Air Minum Isi Ulang: Literature Review

“…Contoh lainnya adalah penelitian di Ponorogo yang menghasilkan dari14 DAMIU yang menjadi sampel sebanyak 78,57% tidak memenuhi persyaratan tempat dan 92,86% tidak memenuhi persyaratan penjamah (Saidah, Rahayu, & Khambali, 2020). Selain itu dari 30 DAMIU yang berada dalam pengawasan dan pembinaan Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara, 20 (66,7%) depot air minum di antaranya tergolong ke dalam kategori tidak laik konsumsi (Rosmiaty, Mizwar, Yunita, & Agusliani, 2019).…”

Perbandingan Kualitas Air Di Pulau Jawa Dan Kalimantan (Review Jurnal)

“…Pewarnaan Gram dilakukan terhadap koloni yang ditumbuhkan pada media NA miring (Mansauda et al, 2014). Adanya E. coli pada tahap ini ditunjukkan dengan hasil pengecatan yang menunjukkan Gram negatif serta koloni yang berbentuk batang (Boekoesoe, 2010 (Rosmiaty et al, 2019), Kota Banjarbaru (Sari, 2016), Kecamatan Pontianak Utara (Subhiandono et al, 2016), dan Kota Samarinda (Puspitasari et al, 2015 Persentase paling tinggi untuk cemaran Coliform pada air minum isi ulang berasal dari Pulau Jawa dan Kalimantan. Nilai persentase tertinggi yaitu sebesar 100% berasal dari sampel yang diperoleh dari Kota Malang (Jawa) dan Samarinda (Kalimantan).…”

“…Pengujian kandungan E. coli air minum isi ulang di Pulau Kalimantan dilakukan pada 43 sampel dari DAMIU berbeda. Sebaran DAMIU tersebut berada di Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara (Rosmiaty et al, 2019), Kota Banjarbaru (Sari, 2016). Uji bakteriologis seluruh sampel dilakukan dengan metode MPN.…”

“…Juwita, U., Haryani, Y. and Jose, C. ( 2014 (Rosmiaty et al, 2019) 6,66% Kota Banjarbaru (Sari, 2016) 84,61% Kec. Pontianak Utara (Subhiandono et al, 2016) 16,66% Kota Samarinda (Puspitasari et al, 2015) 100% Persentase keseluruhan 31,08%…”