2010
DOI: 10.1186/1747-5341-5-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kafka, paranoic doubles and the brain: hypnagogic vs. hyper-reflexive models of disrupted self in neuropsychiatric disorders and anomalous conscious states

Abstract: Kafka's writings are frequently interpreted as representing the historical period of modernism in which he was writing. Little attention has been paid, however, to the possibility that his writings may reflect neural mechanisms in the processing of self during hypnagogic (i.e., between waking and sleep) states. Kafka suffered from dream-like, hypnagogic hallucinations during a sleep-deprived state while writing. This paper discusses reasons (phenomenological and neurobiological) why the self projects an imagin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kafka and Weber fundamentally differ in their understanding of change in the modern world: while Weber understands change scientifically as rationalization, Kafka understands change aesthetically as metamorphosis. Rationalization makes change comprehensible; metamorphosis — to a large extent driven by ‘bureaucratic eros’ — makes change incomprehensible (Mishara, ). Waldo (, p. 5) notes that Kafka's aesthetic notion of metamorphosis that he uses to make a comedy of the world of work and organization manifests a certain ‘hostility of the man of letters towards the world of organization’ that is absent in Weber's scientific (and critical) notion of rationalization.…”
Section: Metamorphosis: Understanding Change Aestheticallymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kafka and Weber fundamentally differ in their understanding of change in the modern world: while Weber understands change scientifically as rationalization, Kafka understands change aesthetically as metamorphosis. Rationalization makes change comprehensible; metamorphosis — to a large extent driven by ‘bureaucratic eros’ — makes change incomprehensible (Mishara, ). Waldo (, p. 5) notes that Kafka's aesthetic notion of metamorphosis that he uses to make a comedy of the world of work and organization manifests a certain ‘hostility of the man of letters towards the world of organization’ that is absent in Weber's scientific (and critical) notion of rationalization.…”
Section: Metamorphosis: Understanding Change Aestheticallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kafka's vision of metamorphosis is an expression of what Paul Valéry (, p. 161) calls ‘the artist's antipathy for progress’. And indeed, Kafka is a Dionysian, not an Apollonian writer: change goes hand in hand with trance, orgies, drunkenness and descent to an underworld (Mishara, , pp. 24–25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers appearing in PEHM illustrate this, and also seek to inform, educate, and at times, provoke debate and controversy. This year has seen a fine complement of papers: some re-examining longstanding questions and constructs of medicine [ 1 - 3 ]; others focusing upon issues that reveal the shifting exigencies and contingencies of healthcare in an evermore technololgic and globalized world culture [ 4 - 10 ], and still others that look to philosophy and history to portend the potential constructs, contexts and concerns that will establish the ethical landscape of medicine in years to come [ 11 - 14 ] Certain papers remain the focus of discourse - and dialectic - for some time as the issues they raise seethe anew in the crucible of professional, public and/or political conversation. To be sure, this has been the case with Prof. Thomas Papadimos' essay "Healthcare Access as a Right not a Privilege: A Construct of Western Thought" [ 15 ], that has stimulated ongoing deliberation and debate upon putative right to medical care, the relationship of ethics to policy, and the assertion of Aristotelian philosophical claims to healthcare-as-right.…”
Section: Respice Adspice Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenological psychiatrist Binswanger also described the self in schizophrenia as captive in the present moment in a “temporal shrinking” of past and future which resembles dreaming . In his fiction, Kafka depicts the reduced expectation in dreamlike‐hypnagogic experiences, where protagonists report “expecting” the very events that “surprise” them . This is not “bizarre‐as‐banal”, but the absence of banal altogether .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%