2015
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/816/1/21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K2 Discovery of Young Eclipsing Binaries in Upper Scorpius: Direct Mass and Radius Determinations for the Lowest Mass Stars and Initial Characterization of an Eclipsing Brown Dwarf Binary

Abstract: We report the discovery of three low-mass double-lined eclipsing binaries in the pre-main sequence Upper Scorpius association, revealed by K2 photometric monitoring of the region over ∼78 days. The orbital periods of all three systems are <5 days. We use the K2 photometry plus multiple Keck/HIRES radial velocities (RVs) and spectroscopic flux ratios to determine fundamental stellar parameters for both the primary and secondary components of each system, along with the orbital parameters. We present tentative e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(150 reference statements)
3
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, in Figure 20 we show the PHOENIX v2 model fits to the observed broadband magnitudes of ADs 3814, 2615, and 1508 reported in Table 1 (for AD 3116, we show the BT-SETTL fit as the PHOENIX models do not extend to low enough temperatures to explain the secondary brown dwarf component). The T eff and distance values derived from our SED-fitting procedure with both the BT-SETTL and PHOENIX v2 models are reported in Table 5 along with the empirical relation predictions of Mann et al (2015) and David et al (2016b). We discuss the effective temperature and distance estimates in the following two sections.…”
Section: Simultaneous Determination Of Effective Temperatures and Dismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, in Figure 20 we show the PHOENIX v2 model fits to the observed broadband magnitudes of ADs 3814, 2615, and 1508 reported in Table 1 (for AD 3116, we show the BT-SETTL fit as the PHOENIX models do not extend to low enough temperatures to explain the secondary brown dwarf component). The T eff and distance values derived from our SED-fitting procedure with both the BT-SETTL and PHOENIX v2 models are reported in Table 5 along with the empirical relation predictions of Mann et al (2015) and David et al (2016b). We discuss the effective temperature and distance estimates in the following two sections.…”
Section: Simultaneous Determination Of Effective Temperatures and Dismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may thus represent "normal" discrete accretion variations and bursts, in contrast to the FU Ori and EX Lup outbursts described above. The NASA K2 mission Campaign 2 observations included the young ρ Ophiuchus molecular cloud region at <1-2 Myr, and the adjacent Upper Scorpius OB association, which is debated from analysis of HR diagrams to be either ∼3-5 Myr based on the low mass stellar population (e.g., Preibisch et al 2002;Herczeg & Hillenbrand 2015) or ∼11 Myr based on the solar and super-solar mass population (Pecaut et al 2012); the latter age is beginning to be favored by results on eclipsing binaries David et al 2016) and asteroseismology (Ripepi et al 2015). By sampling stars with ages comparable to and extending to much older than NGC 2264 (in ρ Oph and Upper Sco, respectively), the K2 time series data can be used to compare accretion burst behavior as a function of age and therefore presumably disk properties which are expected to evolve with time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these stars, stellar models also show systematic discrepancies in the observed mass-radius relations, but on a larger scale. Over 30 eclipsing very low-mass stars (VLMSs) with masses below 0.3 M e and radii known to better than 10% have been observed so far (e.g., Parsons et al 2012;Pyrzas et al 2012;Nefs et al 2013;Gómez Maqueo Chew et al 2014;Zhou et al 2014;Kraus et al 2015;David et al 2016). However, only eight have radii known to a precision better than 2%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%