2017
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K-Λ crossover transition in the conduction band of monolayer MoS 2 under hydrostatic pressure

Abstract: We experimentally demonstrate the direct-to-indirect bandgap transition of monolayer MoS2 under hydrostatic pressure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
80
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
14
80
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation for the observed change in the PL spectra and intensities of CrPS 4 under pressure might be the band gap crossover (direct to indirect band gap). Similar behavior in the PL spectra has been observed previously in several systems such as InP 45 , InSe 46 and monolayer MoS 2 47 , and has been attributed to the direct-indirect gap crossover induced by pressure. However, given that the PL signal of CrPS 4 arises from the parity forbidden d−d transition, which is sensitive to the CrS 6 octahedra, the anomalous behavior of PL data above 3 GPa could be related to a subtle change in the crystal structure, possibly a modification of the CrS 6 octahedra under pressure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…One possible explanation for the observed change in the PL spectra and intensities of CrPS 4 under pressure might be the band gap crossover (direct to indirect band gap). Similar behavior in the PL spectra has been observed previously in several systems such as InP 45 , InSe 46 and monolayer MoS 2 47 , and has been attributed to the direct-indirect gap crossover induced by pressure. However, given that the PL signal of CrPS 4 arises from the parity forbidden d−d transition, which is sensitive to the CrS 6 octahedra, the anomalous behavior of PL data above 3 GPa could be related to a subtle change in the crystal structure, possibly a modification of the CrS 6 octahedra under pressure.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Whereas for the hBN/WSe 2 -ML/hBN heterostructure both exciton energies increase linearly with increasing pressure with a coefficient of 3.5-3.8 meV/GPa, for the bare WSe 2 ML the excitons decrease in energy with a slope of -3.1 and -1.3 meV/GPa for the A-and B-exciton, respectively. Comparing with the available literature data, the pressure coefficient of the A-exciton determined here for the encapsulated WSe 2 ML is roughly one order of magnitude smaller than the one reported for a single ML of MoS 2 (20 meV/GPa [14], 30 meV/GPa [15], 40 meV/GPa [16], 50 meV/GPa [17]), WSe 2 (32 meV/GPa [19]) and WS 2 (20 meV/GPa [20]). All these data were obtained for monolayers on Si/SiO 2 substrates, where the oxide layer was fairly thick, ranging between 200 and 300 nm.…”
Section: -3contrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Because the bands at different points of the Brillouin zone shift in energy with different pressure coefficients, high pressure experiments can be used to distinguish between k-space direct and indirect transitions. As far as truly two-dimensional (2D) TMD materials are concerned, there are already several reports on the dependence on hydrostatic pressure of the emission and vibrational properties of monolayers of MoS 2 [14][15][16][17][18], WSe 2 [19] and WS 2 [20]. The results, however, are surprisingly contradictory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the indirect Q = 1/3 exciton is lower in energy if the material is compressed. This behaviour could be interesting for pressure/strain sensors and similar applications [34].…”
Section: Tmdc Monolayersmentioning
confidence: 92%