K-shell X-ray fluorescence cross-sections and intensity ratios for some pure metals at 59.5 and 123.6keV

Kβ/KαX-Ray Intensity Ratios for Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn in Phthalocyanines Complexes

“…Experimental K β /K α X-ray intensity ratios for these elements have been compared with theoretical estimates [25][26][27] and other experimental results [13,28,29]. Theoretical estimates based on relativistic Hartree-Fock and Hartree-Slater theories were calculated by Scofield [25,26].…”

“…Çevik et al [12] have found chemical effects on the K β /K α X-ray intensity ratios of Mn, Ni and Cu complexes. Similarly, K-shell X-ray fluorescence cross--sections and intensity ratios for some pure metals have been measured using 59.5 and 123.6 keV γ-rays [13]. In many compounds, transfer of electron from the ligand atom to the 3d state of the metal can also cause change in the 3d electron population of the metal which will cause a change in the K β /K α ratio [14][15][16].…”

New procedure calculation of photon-induced Kβ/Kα intensity ratios for elements 16S to 92U

“…Kalayci, Aydinuraz, Table 1 e Summary of the experimental Kb/Ka intensity ratios, Unweighted average value (Kb=Ka), Weighted average value (Kb=Ka W ), Unweighted standard deviation (USD(Kb/Ka)), Weighted standard deviation (WSD (Kb/Ka)) and Unweighted Standard errors (USE (Kb/Ka)). (Raj et al, 2002) 0.1364 ± 0.0134 (Sogut et al, 2002) 0.1265 ± 0.0006 (Pawłowski et al, 2002) 0.1089 ± 0.0043 (S ‚ ahin et al, 2005) 0.1100 ± 0.0090 (Han et al, 2007) 0.1282 ± 0.0080 (Ertu gral et al, 2007)…”

“…S ‚ ahin (2007a, 2007b) measured the Kb/Ka X-ray intensity ratios for 60 Nd, 63 Eu, 64 Gd, 66 Dy and 67 Ho using the 59.5 keV photons in an external magnetic field. The experimental values of Kb/Ka were obtained for the elements 24 Cr, 26 Fe, 27 Co, 29 Cu, 30 Zn, 31 Ga, 34 Se, 39 Y, 42 Mo, 48 Cd, 49 In, 50 Sn, 52 Te, 56 Ba, 73 Ta, 74 W and 83 Bi by Cevik et al (Cevik, Kaya, Ertugral, Baltas, & Karabidak, 2007) using 59.5 keV photons emitted by a 50 mCi 241 Am radioactive source. Kalayci, Aydinuraz, Table 1 e Summary of the experimental Kb/Ka intensity ratios, Unweighted average value (Kb=Ka), Weighted average value (Kb=Ka W ), Unweighted standard deviation (USD(Kb/Ka)), Weighted standard deviation (WSD (Kb/Ka)) and Unweighted Standard errors (USE (Kb/Ka)).…”

“…(B e et al, 1998) 0.1312 ± 0.0008 (Raj et al, 1999) 0.1312 ± 0.0008 (Raj et al, 2002) 0.1316 ± 0.0111 (Sogut et al, 2002) (Raj et al, 2002) 0.1341 ± 0.0130 (Sogut et al, 2002) 0.1314 ± 0.0008 (Pawłowski et al, 2002) 0.1130 ± 0.0090 (Han et al, 2007) 0.1320 ± 0.0050 (Cevik et al, 2007) (Raj et al, 2002) 0.1287 ± 0.0110 (Sogut et al, 2002) 0.1307 ± 0.0007 (Pawłowski et al, 2002) 0.1340 ± 0.0120 ( € Oz,2006) 0.1200 ± 0.0100 (Han et al, 2007) (Padhi and Dhal, 1995) 0.1328 0.1322 0.0053 0.0028 0.0012 0.1379 ± 0.0017 (B e et al, 1998) 0.1335 ± 0.0008 (Raj et al, 1999) 0.1335 ± 0.0008 (Raj et al, 2000) 0.1330 ± 0.0100 (Ertu grul, S€ ogü t, et al, 2001) 0.1335 ± 0.0008 (Raj et al, 2002) 0.1387 ± 0.0140 (Sogut et al, 2002) 0.1335 ± 0.0008 (Pawłowski et al, 2002) 0.1370 ± 0.0110 ( € Oz,2006) 0.1370 ± 0.0080 (Cevik et al, 2007) (Bhuinya and Padhi, 1993) 0.1371 ± 0.0006 (Bhuinya and Padhi, 1993) 0.1336 ± 0.0005 (Padhi and Dhal, 1995) 0.1363 ± 0.0006 (Raj et al, 1998) 0.1377 ± 0.0017…”