2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K-score: A novel scoring system to quantify fatigue-related ergonomic risk based on joint angle measurements via wearable inertial measurement units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the usability and reliability of technologies that allow for quantitative assessments were tested. The use of inertial measurement units (IMU) or Kinect cameras for fatigue assessments allow for the detection of kinematic changes in long-duration manual tasks [ 286 ]. These methods are easy-to-use in real time and could assist ergonomists in risk evaluations on site [ 306 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the usability and reliability of technologies that allow for quantitative assessments were tested. The use of inertial measurement units (IMU) or Kinect cameras for fatigue assessments allow for the detection of kinematic changes in long-duration manual tasks [ 286 ]. These methods are easy-to-use in real time and could assist ergonomists in risk evaluations on site [ 306 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies proposed exoskeletons or supporting devices in order to reduce the FSE, especially in prolonged posture maintenance and overhead working tasks [ 259 , 263 ] that require high loads on the neck, back and shoulder [ 261 ]. Another category included papers that design and validate alternative methods for assessing FSE during working activities, such as marker-less systems [ 286 , 306 ] or EMG measures [ 293 ]. Finally, few papers described new protocols for assessing FSE or for implementing intervention programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the two factors of horizontal distance between the body and the lift and the need for external augmentation, external augmentation is needed when the height is less than 150 cm, but changing the height of the lift is also an option, and proper adjustment of the height of the lift can avoid physical injury. Muscle activity levels are also generally higher when loads are higher ( Martinez et al, 2022 ). Table 4 shows the relationship between height range and horizontal distance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We designed an experimental setup and procedure, described in our previous work [ 27 ], to physically exhaust participants during a standard material handling job while measuring their muscle fatigue levels with two different tools: EMG recordings, and a kinematic score (K-score) measured using wearable IMUs. Nine able-bodied participants (all male, age: 24 ± 2, body mass: 71 ± 9 kg, body height: 177 ± 2 cm) performed a material handling job.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite previous efforts to study this research question [ 24 , 25 , 26 ], there is still a need for an objective tool to prove if specific work–rest schedules can reduce muscle fatigue. In our last study [ 27 ], we introduced a postural phenomenon that occurs during fatigue measured with IMU sensors. In this paper, we want to (1) assess the ability of our system to detect muscle fatigue via inertial measurement units (IMUs) during a standard material handling job with three different work–rest schedules and validate it with an EMG sensor, and (2) compare the muscle fatigue among these three schedules to quantify the impact of each schedule on muscle fatigue and potentially the risk of fatigue-induced WMSDs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%