1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-4937(82)80007-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K-Rb relations in the alkaline suites of the Eastern Ghats precambrian belt, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption is based on the general geochemical characters ofthe syenite including high transition element levels and K/Rb ratios. This assumption is substantiated by observations made on similar alkalic plutons of Kerala region (Nair and Santosh 1984a, b;Santosh and Nair 1985) as well as from the adjacent terrains (Bose et al 1982). Moreover, the syenite is emplaced along an active fault-lineament which has probable extension to mantle-depths like other fault-lineaments of the region (Santosh and Sankar 1984).…”
Section: Petrogenesismentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This assumption is based on the general geochemical characters ofthe syenite including high transition element levels and K/Rb ratios. This assumption is substantiated by observations made on similar alkalic plutons of Kerala region (Nair and Santosh 1984a, b;Santosh and Nair 1985) as well as from the adjacent terrains (Bose et al 1982). Moreover, the syenite is emplaced along an active fault-lineament which has probable extension to mantle-depths like other fault-lineaments of the region (Santosh and Sankar 1984).…”
Section: Petrogenesismentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Sarkar et al 1981), although the element trends described by the Chilka Lake anorthositeleuconorites are slightly shifted compared to their counterparts at Turkel. It stands to reason, therefore, that the comagmatic nature of the low-K anorthositeleuconorite suite and the high-K quartz monzonitegranite suite as advocated for the Chilka Lake by Sarkar et al (1981) and tacitly assumed for the Eastern Ghats massif anorthosite complexes in general by Bose (1979) and Leelanandam and Narsimha Reddy (1988) is not tenable. It also follows that the validity of the isochron determined by Sarkar et al (1981) for the Chilka Lake complex is open to scrutiny.…”
Section: Petrogenetic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 98%