1992
DOI: 10.1016/0168-583x(92)95208-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K-MM radiative Auger effect in solid Ca, Ti and Cr targets after ionization with 0.7–1.5 MeV protons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the radiative Auger effect. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The shake process is a monopole transition process, that is to say, the 3p electron is excited into an np discrete level or an εp continuum level. Radiative Auger spectra are weak X-ray emission spectra near the characteristic X-ray lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the radiative Auger effect. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The shake process is a monopole transition process, that is to say, the 3p electron is excited into an np discrete level or an εp continuum level. Radiative Auger spectra are weak X-ray emission spectra near the characteristic X-ray lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in this case the photon beam energy is higher than the KL double ionization threshold, this can be due to the additional broadening resulting from multi-ionization processes. Furthermore, since both excitation energies are lower than the double K ionization threshold which amounts to 8003 eV for Ca [38], the spectra are free from the Kα h 1,2 hypersatellite lines appearing in the proton-induced spectra [24] at the energy of -173.5(6) eV. On the other hand, according to [40], for Ca the contributions from the x-ray resonant Raman scattering and RER transitions can be assumed to be negligibly small in comparison with the RA intensity.…”
Section: A Kmm Ra Shapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical energies calculated using the DV-Xα [10] and radiative field [12] models as well as the values deduced from the Auger transition energies [24] are also listed for comparison.…”
Section: B Relative Ra Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations