1995
DOI: 10.2172/197210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K-Basin spent nuclear fuel characterization data report

Abstract: SummaryAn Integrated Process Strategy has been developed to package, condition, transport, and store in an interim storage facility the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) currently residing in the K-Basins at Hanford. Information required to support the development of the conditioning process and to support the safety analyses must be obtained fiom characterization testing activities conducted on fuel samples from the Basins. Some of the information obtained in the testing was reported in PNL-10778, K-Basin Spent Nuclea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Magnox SNF did not exhibit the kind of physical damage that much of the N Reactor SNF showed, and therefore the uranium metal did not have the prolonged direct exposure to water that the N Reactor SNF has had. This fuel had burnups ranging from 1,100 to 9,850 MWd/t (reasonably typical of the N Reactor SNF), but had displayed more extensive localized irradiation swelling (ranging from 5% to 50%) compared to swelling of approximately a few percent observed on the N Reactor SNF (Abrefah et al 1995 The degradation of all uranium metal-based DSNF is taken to be similar to that observed by Gray and Einziger (1998 [DIRS 109691] , although the absolute rates were higher for the N Reactor SNF (see Table 6-4). Table 6 A significant fraction of the N Reactor fuel has been stored in a damaged condition under water at the K-basins at Hanford, and the metallic uranium has been exposed to the water environment.…”
Section: Dsnf Group 5 (Thorium/uranium Carbide Snf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Magnox SNF did not exhibit the kind of physical damage that much of the N Reactor SNF showed, and therefore the uranium metal did not have the prolonged direct exposure to water that the N Reactor SNF has had. This fuel had burnups ranging from 1,100 to 9,850 MWd/t (reasonably typical of the N Reactor SNF), but had displayed more extensive localized irradiation swelling (ranging from 5% to 50%) compared to swelling of approximately a few percent observed on the N Reactor SNF (Abrefah et al 1995 The degradation of all uranium metal-based DSNF is taken to be similar to that observed by Gray and Einziger (1998 [DIRS 109691] , although the absolute rates were higher for the N Reactor SNF (see Table 6-4). Table 6 A significant fraction of the N Reactor fuel has been stored in a damaged condition under water at the K-basins at Hanford, and the metallic uranium has been exposed to the water environment.…”
Section: Dsnf Group 5 (Thorium/uranium Carbide Snf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examination and testing conducted at PNNL on damaged N Reactor zirconium-clad uranium metal fuel showed small but discernable amounts of uranium hydride formed as precipitates within the metal (Marschman et al 1997 , the chance of spontaneous ignition will be considered in this analysis to support the screening argument of low consequence of pyrophoric event to the postclosure TSPA-LA. Because the fraction of N Reactor SNF with cladding that is damaged enough to expose the metallic uranium core is quantitatively unknown but potentially significant (Abrefah et al 1995 [DIRS 151125]), all the SNF elements will be regarded as damaged for the purposes of this analysis.…”
Section: Tspa Dispositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant fraction of the N-reactor fuel is visibly damaged, and much of the rest could have small pinholes/cracks in the cladding. The exposed uranium metal surfaces of the N-reactor fuel elements show extensive corrosion resulting from the many years of direct exposure to the K-basin water (Abrefah et al 1995;Abrefah et al 1999, Figure 3 where k is the corrosion rate, A is the activation energy for dissolution (66.4 f 2.0 kJ/mol), R is the gas constant (8.3 14 J/mol-K), and TK is the temperature in kelvins.…”
Section: Dsnf Group 7 (U-metal Snf) Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%