2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K−12 teachers' stress and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review

Abstract: We present the first systematic literature review on stress and burnout in K−12 teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on a systematic literature search, we identified 17 studies that included 9,874 K−12 teachers from around the world. These studies showed some indication that burnout did increase during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were, however, almost no differences in the levels of stress and burnout experienced by K−12 teachers compared to individuals employed in other occupational fields. School pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We measured teacher burnout by calculating a total score for the following questions: 'I feel emotionally drained from my work;' 'I feel burned out from my work;' and 'I feel frustrated with my job.' Additional study findings throughout the pandemic showed that teachers reported increased workloads and high levels of stress, anxiety, and burnout (e.g., Carver-Thomas et al, 2021;Kaden, 2020;Rǎducu & Stǎnculescu, 2022;Sokal et al, 2020;Westphal et al, 2022), which further supported our decision to use a short burnout scale to limit the time and work required of teachers at the end of the school year. Additionally, we included scales that measured teacher job satisfaction (Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2011), administrative support (Seidman & Zager, 1986), teacher autonomy (Virginia Department of Education, 2021), all using 6-point Likert scales ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.…”
Section: Surveysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…We measured teacher burnout by calculating a total score for the following questions: 'I feel emotionally drained from my work;' 'I feel burned out from my work;' and 'I feel frustrated with my job.' Additional study findings throughout the pandemic showed that teachers reported increased workloads and high levels of stress, anxiety, and burnout (e.g., Carver-Thomas et al, 2021;Kaden, 2020;Rǎducu & Stǎnculescu, 2022;Sokal et al, 2020;Westphal et al, 2022), which further supported our decision to use a short burnout scale to limit the time and work required of teachers at the end of the school year. Additionally, we included scales that measured teacher job satisfaction (Skaalvik & Skaalvik, 2011), administrative support (Seidman & Zager, 1986), teacher autonomy (Virginia Department of Education, 2021), all using 6-point Likert scales ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree.…”
Section: Surveysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In the reviews identified in our search, the pooled prevalence of anxiety, depression, and stress among teachers during the pandemic ranged between 10%–49.4%, 16%–59.9%, and 12.6%–62.6%, respectively. Moreover, in their review containing longitudinal studies that compared experiences of teachers before and during the pandemic, Westphal and colleagues (2022) noted that some studies reported a decrease in feelings of accomplishment and an increase in depersonalization and emotional exhaustion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, many teachers are under pressure to impact the learning loss during the pandemic. This includes raising student test scores on state‐mandated assessments; however, teachers are burned out (e.g., Carver‐Thomas et al, 2021; Rǎducu & Stǎnculescu, 2022; Sokal et al, 2020; Westphal et al, 2022), and teachers have had a decrease in their teacher self‐efficacy (e.g., Pellerone, 2021; Pressley & Ha, 2021; Rabaglietti et al, 2021). Further educational policies need to focus on supporting teachers rather than adding more pressure on teachers to limit potential teacher burnout (Ryan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%