2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

JUXTA: A new probe of X-ray emission from the Jupiter system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the annealing, the side wall of the new sample shows the best roughness at 1∼100 µm scale. In the future planetary exploration missions [5], the roughness should be <1 nm at <10 µm scale and less than 25 [nm]× (scale [µm]/10 [µm]) [nm] at >10 µm scale. The former is reasoned from the X-ray reflectivity, while the latter is from the angular resolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After the annealing, the side wall of the new sample shows the best roughness at 1∼100 µm scale. In the future planetary exploration missions [5], the roughness should be <1 nm at <10 µm scale and less than 25 [nm]× (scale [µm]/10 [µm]) [nm] at >10 µm scale. The former is reasoned from the X-ray reflectivity, while the latter is from the angular resolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet stringent requirements on the image resolution for the ground-based and especially space applications [5], the side walls used for X-ray mirrors should be flat and smooth with rms roughness on the order of tens of nm or less at >10 µm scale. Figure 1 shows a sample of a single stage MEMS X-ray optic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, we need more detailed information such as spatial and spectral distributions with a moderate resolution about the diffuse X-ray emission (as well as JSR). Ezoe et al (2013) proposed a future astronomical mission named Jupiter X-ray telescope array (JUXTA), which aims at the first in-situ measurement of Jupiter and its neighborhood with X-ray instruments.…”
Section: Discussion: Comparison With the Past Suzaku Observation In 2006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline design is scalable to a smaller or larger optics depending on available resources or mission objectives. For example, a bigger telescope similar to Bepicolombo/MIXS-T (f ∼ 100 cm) or a smaller telescope similar to JUXTA (f ∼ 25 cm Ezoe et al 2013) can be implemented. MiXO-70W is optimized for wide field monitoring with the combined FoV of 7 deg 2 and broad band coverage with relatively higher grasp at high energies due to small grazing angles of each module.…”
Section: Example Mixo Configurations and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%