1989
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.1989.11515970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Juvenile–like character of apple trees produced by grafting scions and rootstocks produced by micropropagation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field performance of apple trees grafted on micropropagated dwarfing rootstocks was previously shown to differ from that of trees grafted on conventionally propagated counterparts (Jones and Hadlow, 1989). Although apple trees with dwarfing rootstocks derived directly from micropropagation had many suckers and burrknots, those with dwarfing rootstocks propagated from cuttings derived from micropropagated plants showed improved growth, similar to that of trees with dwarfing rootstocks obtained by conventional propagation (Jones and Webster, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The field performance of apple trees grafted on micropropagated dwarfing rootstocks was previously shown to differ from that of trees grafted on conventionally propagated counterparts (Jones and Hadlow, 1989). Although apple trees with dwarfing rootstocks derived directly from micropropagation had many suckers and burrknots, those with dwarfing rootstocks propagated from cuttings derived from micropropagated plants showed improved growth, similar to that of trees with dwarfing rootstocks obtained by conventional propagation (Jones and Webster, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In addition to the propagation method, sprouting was influenced by the rootstock cultivar. A cultivar-specific influence was also observed in micropropagated and conventionalpropagated apple rootstocks (Jones and Hadlow, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Increased suckering and burrknotting of micropropagated rootstocks was also reported in France by Villeneuve ( 1986). These effects are, however, not always consistent, as Jones & Hadlow (1989) showed that micropropagation had no effect on the suckering or burrknotting of the apple rootstock M.27, although it did increase suckering of M.9 and M.25. Navatel et al (1988) showed that although micropropagation increased burrknotting and suckering of a Pajam selection of M.9 compared with conventional propagation, the severity of the problem was greatly influenced by where the trees were eventually grown in France.…”
Section: Orchard Performance Of Micropropagated Rootstocksmentioning
confidence: 70%