Juvenile Detention as Process and Place

Dunlap, Earl L.; Roush, David W.

doi:10.1111/j.1755-6988.1995.tb00813.x

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The development of a continuum of services to more accurately meet the offender's needs while ensuring community protection and providing more cost-effective services (Dunlap & Roush, 1995)…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Skills Training in Juvenile Detention: A Rationale

Roush¹

1996

Juvenile Family Court J

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Skills Training in Juvenile Detention: A Rationale

Roush¹

1996

Juvenile Family Court J

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research studies that aim to validate or discredit theories of effectiveness have to be understood in light of the authors' understanding of detention's role. In 1995, Earl Dunlap, the then-Executive Director of the National Juvenile Detention Association (NJDA) and Dr. David W. Roush, a justice system consultant, published an article that stands as a good summary of the paradoxes inherent in this institution (Dunlap & Roush, 1995). They note that detention suffers from a confusion of function and can become a catchall for contradictory purposes which may include meting out punishment, securely holding youth prior to hearings, holding youth who have no clear alternative placement, and as a space to provide health and treatment interventions.…”

Section: Relevant Theories Regarding the Purpose Of Detentionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Detention on Youth Outcomes: A Rapid Evidence Review

Gilman

Walker

Vick

et al. 2021

Crime & Delinquency

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While there is ample research examining the short- and long-term effects of juvenile incarceration (broadly defined), less is known about the specific consequences of the most common form of youth incarceration, juvenile detention. We conducted a Rapid Evidence Review (RER), limiting our search to the past 10 years to include studies that captured modern juvenile justice practices, to assess the body of literature evaluating the effects of juvenile detention on youth outcomes. Our initial search yielded over 1,800 articles, but only three ultimately met criteria for inclusion in our review. We conclude that there is a profound lack of research regarding the consequences of juvenile detention, an issue that affects a large number of youth in the United States.

show abstract

“…Another way to understand removal is from the "process versus place" perspective (Dunlap & Roush, 1995). High levels of removal and high emphases on security are comparable to a "place" orientation where a "one-size-fits-all" strategy often applies to incarceration.…”

Section: Application Of the Process Perspectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Reentry and Removal: Implications for Juvenile Confinement Facilities

Roush¹,

Moeser²,

Walsh³

2005

Juvenile and Family Court Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An important national initiative in juvenile justice is Juvenile Offender Reentry (JOR). The renewed emphasis on offender reintegration has generated significant attention to juvenile justice practices, with the notable exception of juvenile confinement facilities. Juvenile detention and, to a lesser degree, juvenile corrections practitioners are involved but not invested in reentry, having made very few programmatic changes to accommodate JOR initiatives largely because these initiatives have been external to the institution and its staff. Yet, reentry is a powerful concept for juvenile facility practitioners, and the application of reentry principles could have a profound impact on daily operations. This article addresses a range of issues about investing juvenile institutions in reentry practices. Several reentry models are discussed along with their implications for daily operations and programs.

show abstract

Juvenile Detention as Process and Place

Cited by 5 publications

References 12 publications

Social Skills Training in Juvenile Detention: A Rationale

Social Skills Training in Juvenile Detention: A Rationale

The Impact of Detention on Youth Outcomes: A Rapid Evidence Review

Reentry and Removal: Implications for Juvenile Confinement Facilities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About