2019
DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2019090323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Juvenile Delinquent as a Subject of Restorative Justice

Abstract: This article discusses have often in trials and retrospective analysis of materials 80 criminal cases, which were considered a crime committed by minors, led to the conclusion about the need to change the existing criminal procedural practices in relation to adolescents and young adults. It was revealed that the subjects of law enforcement practice did not fully investigate the psychological specifics of the experience of guilt by a juvenile offender as a subject of restorative justice. As a result, the system… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Poland, the law of October 26, 1982 on Judicial Proceedings with Minors is in force, which takes precedence over other laws and includes substantive and procedural law, regulating the criminal or administrative liability of minors. The law establishes the priority of the rehabilitation approach, allowing when considering cases involving minors to the court at any stage to transfer the case to a mediator (intermediary), whose report is taken into account when making a judicial decision (Sharanov et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Poland, the law of October 26, 1982 on Judicial Proceedings with Minors is in force, which takes precedence over other laws and includes substantive and procedural law, regulating the criminal or administrative liability of minors. The law establishes the priority of the rehabilitation approach, allowing when considering cases involving minors to the court at any stage to transfer the case to a mediator (intermediary), whose report is taken into account when making a judicial decision (Sharanov et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%