2011
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1470-11.2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Juvenile Administration of Concomitant Methylphenidate and Fluoxetine Alters Behavioral Reactivity to Reward- and Mood-Related Stimuli and Disrupts Ventral Tegmental Area Gene Expression in Adulthood

Abstract: There is a rise in the concurrent use of methylphenidate (MPH) and fluoxetine (FLX) in pediatric populations. However, the long-term neurobiological consequences of combined MPH and FLX treatment (MPH+FLX) during juvenile periods are unknown. We administered saline (VEH), MPH, FLX, or MPH+FLX to juvenile Sprague-Dawley male rats from postnatal day 20–35, and assessed their reactivity to reward- and mood-related stimuli 24-h or 2-months after drug exposure. We also assessed mRNA and protein levels within the ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
81
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
6
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present rats were treated during adolescence (postnatal days 35–40); these molecular changes thus endured towards young adulthood of the animals. Our findings complement other recent findings showing that methylphenidate+fluoxetine pretreatment in juvenile rats produced molecular changes in midbrain dopamine neurons and behavioral alterations that in part were still present (or even more robust) in adult animals [33] (see below).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present rats were treated during adolescence (postnatal days 35–40); these molecular changes thus endured towards young adulthood of the animals. Our findings complement other recent findings showing that methylphenidate+fluoxetine pretreatment in juvenile rats produced molecular changes in midbrain dopamine neurons and behavioral alterations that in part were still present (or even more robust) in adult animals [33] (see below).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, a recent study showed that methylphenidate+fluoxetine pretreatment in juvenile rats modifies place preference conditioning by cocaine in adulthood [33]. Thus, adding fluoxetine to repeated methylphenidate pretreatment produced enhanced preference for the cocaine-paired environment, in contrast to the cocaine avoidance expressed by the methylphenidate only-pretreated controls [33]. This finding of an enhanced cocaine preference (sensitivity) later in life does suggest an increased abuse/addiction risk for the drug combination (for review, see [10]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, overdose of MPH produce agitation, restlessness and hallucinations in human beings (5) as well as hyper-locomotion and impaired cognition in animals (6). Subchronic administration of methylphenidate in juvenile rodents has been found to induce long-lasting behavioral adaptations (7,8). To achieve therapeutic benefit and minimal side-effects, it is suggested that the doses of MPH should be titrated to an optimal level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a study with children and adolescents with depression and/or anxiety (Kronenberg et al 2007) found that the s/s genotype was associated with poor antidepressant treatment response only to depressive symptoms but not anxiety symptoms. Further, animal studies have shown that, unlike the anxiolytic effects of antidepressants in adults (Holick et al 2008), antidepressant exposure during adolescence appears to have anxiogenic rather than anxiolytic effects (Oh et al 2009;Warren et al 2011). Moreover, studies with children and adolescents with depression or anxiety disorders have reported high rates of agitation or anxiety-like symptoms during antidepressant treatment (ReySánchez and Gutiérrez-Casares 1997;March et al 1998;Ambrosini et al 1999;Cook et al 2001;Emslie et al 2002;Braconnier et al 2003;Wagner et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%