Justice in the Development of the Cultural and Civilizational World

Abstract

Trust as a characteristic of social relations is based on the mechanisms of cooperation / partnership and competition. In the activity, requests are realized not only at the production-functional level, but also the need for social communications. In the processes of communication, satisfaction of interests and achievement of goals, the most viable socially significant innovations are singled out [1][2][3]. So, organic development needs to cultivate a variety of forms of bona fide co-operation and competition.Among the meso-, macro-, micro-and other distinguished levels of interregional relations, interactions between the cultural and civilizational worlds are of cardinal importance. The understanding of justice is based on the basic value-sense complexes of the cultural and civilizational worlds, which have both cross-cultural and specific ones. The search for authentic incarnations of Truth, Goodness, Beauty as lofty ideals always and ahead of time, and lead their cultural and civilizational worlds. Such searches are given to humanity «for growth». Accordingly, from the utilitarianpragmatic point of view, such incarnations are redundant, excessive, impractical, because they are located in other axes of coordinates [4][5][6]. When there is no stable external support in the form of a common ideology, a unified culture, a universally recognized science, then one should be tolerant of everything, recognize the right to a dissimilar one. In this context, the very concept of development needs to be updated: in addition to stable and balanced growth, it should be guided by such maxims as solidarity, freedom of choice, beliefs and words, tolerance. The concept of peripheral culture disappears: they are all equal. It's necessary to move from a habit to imposing global standards on extremely diverse cultural worlds to an orientation toward cultivating their own conditions of productivity and long-term stability of life.At the same time, strategies that carry risks of deterioration in the quality of life of broad strata or socio-demographic indicators must certainly be excluded. Harmonization of individual and social, the balance of the components of openness and closeness, the possibilities of the post-market mechanism and public-private interaction provides for a form of combining the energy of private initiative and entrepreneurship with flexible state regulation. Organizational and managerial transformations once again remind us of the existence of three main dimensions: 1 Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Free-lance, Ukraine