1993
DOI: 10.5465/256591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Justice as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Methods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
535
1
29

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 549 publications
(607 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
535
1
29
Order By: Relevance
“…29 Workplace behaviour was measured using a five-dimension organisational citizenship behaviour scale developed by Podsakoff & McKenzie, 30 which measures being helpful and conscientious and performing duties beyond those normally expected and generally improving aspects of the job. 28,31,32 The model identifies five dimensions of citizenship behaviour that emerged with reported reliabilities over 0.70 for each dimension. 28 Job satisfaction was explored through several items with scaled responses.…”
Section: Sampling and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…29 Workplace behaviour was measured using a five-dimension organisational citizenship behaviour scale developed by Podsakoff & McKenzie, 30 which measures being helpful and conscientious and performing duties beyond those normally expected and generally improving aspects of the job. 28,31,32 The model identifies five dimensions of citizenship behaviour that emerged with reported reliabilities over 0.70 for each dimension. 28 Job satisfaction was explored through several items with scaled responses.…”
Section: Sampling and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,31,32 The model identifies five dimensions of citizenship behaviour that emerged with reported reliabilities over 0.70 for each dimension. 28 Job satisfaction was explored through several items with scaled responses. None of the job satisfaction scales in the extant literature covered intention to leave and perceived likelihood of finding another job.…”
Section: Sampling and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, the perceived injustices evoked by abusive supervision explain subordinates' behavioral responses. Hence, our work adds to a growing number of studies that implicate subordinates' justice perceptions in explaining responses to leadership practices (e.g., Mossholder et al, 1998;Niehoff & Moorman, 1993;Pillai et al, 1999;Tepper et al, 1998).…”
Section: Implications For Theory Research and Practicementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Further, several studies suggest that justice perceptions transmit the effects of supervisory practices on employees' perceptions, affective reactions, and performance contributions, including OCBs (Mossholder, Bennett, Kemery, & Wesolowski, 1998;Niehoff & Moorman, 1993;Pillai, Schriesheim, & Williams, 1999;Tepper, Eisenbach, Kirby, & Potter, 1998). In the only study that has examined justice as a mediator of abusive supervision, Tepper (2000) found that subordinates' procedural justice perceptions explained the effects of abusive supervision on subordinates' job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and conflict between work and family.…”
Section: Mediating Effects Of Procedural Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For latent variables that were measured by one indicator variable, measurement error was taken into consideration by setting the path from the latent variable to the scale score equal to the product of the square root of the reliability and its standard deviation, and by setting the error variance equal to the product of the variance of the scale score and 1.0 minus the reliability (Niehoff & Moorman, 1993).…”
Section: Structural Equation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%