Just you wait… and fill out this survey. Discussion of the methodological aspects of waiting room surveys

Abstract

A method commonly used in health care research is the waiting room (WR) survey. While patients are waiting for their appointment, they are asked to complete a questionnaire measuring their attitudes, behaviors and other characteristics. In this paper we synthesize practical guidelines for WR surveys by comparing the method with two similar approaches: public intercept (PI) surveys and drop-off-pick-up (DOPU) surveys. In this comparison we use the Total Survey Error approach Groves (Survey Methodology, Wiley, New York, 2004); (Groves in Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5): 849-879, 2010) and apply it to three case examples in which one of the three surveys is used. We take into account measurement (validity, measurement- and processing error) and representation (coverage-, sampling- and nonresponse error). From our review, we conclude that waiting room surveys, though limited to patients and their caregivers, can provide useful information on patients’ perspective on health care. Response rates in waiting rooms are usually high, but often not even reported. We recommend adjustment for sampling bias by taking into account the number of visits to the hospital per respondent and sample times proportionate to the number of sample members expected on a particular time. These surveys also allow for collection of para-data; i.e., relevant information in the circumstances of a request to participate in survey research, and behavior of surveyors can easily be controlled, or investigated in an experimental design.

Relationship between traits and sleep quality of hospitalized elderly patients and sleep quality of family caregivers

“…Thus, we recruited a total of 212 (106 pairs) caregivers and elderly inpatients for this study. In studies involving caregivers, a common problem that is encountered with questionnaires is caregivers and patients discussing the question item responses or one of the two filling out the questionnaire for the other, which can cause bias or a lack of authenticity in the research data (Ongena & Haan, 2022 ). To prevent the elderly inpatients and the caregivers from influencing each other when filling out the research questionnaire, we interviewed them separately.…”

The relationship between electronic human resource management and employee job satisfaction in organizational value-creation in Africa: the case of Zimbabwe

“…The instrument was piloted on 15 respondents. A drop and pick up method was used to administer the questionnaire to a sample of 510 respondents, due to its relative higher response rate (Ongena and Haan, 2022).…”