Just thank God for Donald Trump – Dialogue practices of populists and their supporters before and after taking office

Stopfner, Maria

doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.002

Cited by 24 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Closer attention to the addressee of political discourse underpins a number of papers on communication theory and PR practices with the use of modern high-tech media means (Karlsson and Åström 2017;Bossetta et al, 2017;Stopfner, 2021). One of the authors' (Karlsson & Åström, 2017) concerns is the degree of influence of definite political actions verbalized in the internet texts (namely, blogs) on citizens and the degree of importance of interactive communication between political figures (addressant) and Internet-users (addressee).…”

Section: Addressee Of Political Discourse In Other Research Paradigmsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Political discourse from the standpoint of the addressee

Kuznyetsova¹

2021

Cognition, Communication, Discourse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article is an overview of West-European and Asian linguistic discussion of the issue of the addressee as one of the key components of political discourse. It considers the concept of political discourse addressee as well as the issue of speech influence and discourse manipulation since the latter is the most important characteristic of the type of discourse under consideration. To date, actualization of the addressee in political discourse is not sufficiently studied; hence, there is a respective gap in political discourse studies. This conclusion is made upon reviewing modern trends in political discourse research in West-European and Asian linguistics, critical discourse analysis being the major and the most representative of them, with the contribution of political discourse analysis and critical applied linguistics. The overview shows that the linguistic trends listed above have contributed greatly into the study of discourse, in general, and political discourse, in particular. The article also demonstrates the results of the study of political discourse addressee as groups of voters, conducted in papers on communication theory and PR-practices and argues that such approach appears insufficient as it must be augmented by the study of the addressee in terms of cognitive linguistics. This paper concludes that an addressee of political discourse is not in the focus of modern West-European linguistics and thus requires further in-depth analysis, which can be done by applying the communicative-cognitive approach in its multimodal aspect.

show abstract

Section: Addressee Of Political Discourse In Other Research Paradigmsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Political discourse from the standpoint of the addressee

Kuznyetsova¹

2021

Cognition, Communication, Discourse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4. Addressee of political discourse in other research paradigms Closer attention to the addressee of political discourse underpins a number of papers on communication theory and PR practices with the use of modern high-tech media means (Karlsson and Åström 2017;Bossetta et al, 2017;Stopfner, 2021). One of the authors' (Karlsson & Åström, 2017) concerns is the degree of influence of definite political actions verbalized in the internet texts (namely, blogs) on citizens and the degree of importance of interactive communication between political figures (addressant) and Internet-users (addressee).…”

Section: Political Discourse Addressee In Critical Discourse Analysis...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Other characteristics of this addressee remain outside the researchers' scope. Stopfner (Stopfner, 2021) investigates the Tweeter communication between Donald Trump and Boris Johnson, supported by their like-minded fans, as political rivals with opposed views, concerning social strategies. The author suggests pragma-rhetoric analysis of online communication of these two political clusters, and the analyses combine both a pragmatic and a rhetorical approaches in an attempt to exploit synergies that may lead "to a rhetorical perspectivisation of pragmatic analysis and to a pragmatic systematization of rhetorical practice" (Ilie, 2018, p. 92).…”

Section: Political Discourse Addressee In Critical Discourse Analysis...mentioning

confidence: 99%

23

2021

Cognition, Communication, Discourse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

home Текст подано в авторській редакції. Статті пройшли внутрішнє та зовнішнє рецензування. Періодичність -2 випуски на рік Журнал "Kognitsia, kommunikatsia, diskurs" індексовано в міжнародних базах даних: Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ),

show abstract

“…On another occasion, he called his opponent motherf****r, son of a b***h which led him to impeachment in re-elected as President (Reyes & Ross, 2021). Therefore, many researchers have investigated his political speeches to interpret his implied meaning and his political purposes in delivering his speeches (Book et al, 2020;Elder, 2020;Reyes and Ross, 2021;Stoner, 2021;Alenisi, & Abusaleek, 2022). Despite many studies investigating Donald Trump's political speeches, very little research has attempted to show how President Trump's speeches has affected the teaching material of English.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Engaging Students’ Writing Competency on Metadiscourse Markers Using Donald Trump Presidential Speeches

Suswati¹,

Malik²

2023

SAGA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to investigate the implication of Donald Trump Presidential speeches as the teaching material of Metadiscourse Markers (MM) in writing class. It employed a qualitative study of English students after the pandemic situation. The research population consisted of 30 second-year students (male and female) from one selected class of Contextual Written Language Skills (CWLS) in the English Education Department of State University of Medan, Indonesia. The CWLS students’ writing ability was assessed using a questionnaire and Donald Trump Presidential speech transcripts taken from millercenter.org. The study referred to Hyland’s metadiscourse taxonomy (2005) and Lee’s contextual factors in writing (2016). The findings revealed that there was a distinct improvement in CWLS students’ writing ability between males and females on MM. This study also found that methodological variables such as teaching material and instructional design were some of the influencing factors in the learning process of MM using Donald Trump Presidential speeches.

show abstract

Just thank God for Donald Trump – Dialogue practices of populists and their supporters before and after taking office

Cited by 24 publications

References 21 publications

Political discourse from the standpoint of the addressee

Political discourse from the standpoint of the addressee

23

Engaging Students’ Writing Competency on Metadiscourse Markers Using Donald Trump Presidential Speeches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About