ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2019.8682545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Just Noticeable Difference Model for Asymmetrically Distorted Stereoscopic Images

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a saliency-weighted stereoscopic JND (SSJND) model constructed based on psychophysical experiments, accounting for binocular disparity and spatial masking effects of the human visual system (HVS). Specifically, a disparity-aware binocular JND model is first developed using psychophysical data, and then is employed to estimate the JND threshold for non-occluded pixel (NOP). In addition, to derive a reliable 3D-JND prediction, we determine the visibility threshold for occluded pixel (OP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yue et al [7] proposed an effective blind quality assessment approach for TM images through a comprehensive consideration of their characteristics. Fan et al [8] integrated 3D-JND models in stereoscopic image quality assessment. Jiang et al [9] propose a novel codebook-based BIQA method by optimizing multistage discriminative dictionaries (MSDDs) to address the memory-consuming, over-fitting and semantic gap problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yue et al [7] proposed an effective blind quality assessment approach for TM images through a comprehensive consideration of their characteristics. Fan et al [8] integrated 3D-JND models in stereoscopic image quality assessment. Jiang et al [9] propose a novel codebook-based BIQA method by optimizing multistage discriminative dictionaries (MSDDs) to address the memory-consuming, over-fitting and semantic gap problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%