Just‐in‐time implementation issues among automotive suppliers in the southern USA

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to provide insight into the major supply chain issues of the automotive manufacturing industry in the southern USA. Design/methodology/approach -This paper is based on the results of a survey of automotive suppliers in Tennessee and Alabama. The survey focused on supply chain issues and demographics, specifically on 20 JIT-related problems and 100 company characteristics. Findings -Identifies the extent of JIT implementation in Tennessee's and Alabama's growing automotive industry and the general characteristics of the companies that use JIT. Also identifies the types of problems experienced by JIT automotive suppliers; categorizes the problems as one-time, periodically recurring, or ongoing; and identifies the most troublesome problems.Research limitations/implications -The survey results point to several problem areas of JIT suppliers for research focus, including identification of ways that small companies can resolve JIT implementation issues, the most common ongoing problem of unstable customer schedules, and the most frequently cited problems of poor production quality. Practical implications -The findings of this study can help others considering a conversion to a JIT system improve the likelihood of a successful implementation by making them aware of the implementation issues experienced by the JIT automotive suppliers in Tennessee and Alabama. It also provides guidelines for specific improvements that could be implemented by Tennessee and Alabama suppliers. Originality/value -This paper provides a concise review of JIT literature. It also examines the growing automotive manufacturing industry in the southern USA. These smaller, primarily non-union automotive suppliers represent a research set that has not been previously studied.

Lean, green and resilient practices influence on supply chain performance: interpretive structural modeling approach

“…According to Matson and Matson (2007), today's emphasis on lean manufacturing for global competitiveness supports the need for efficient JIT supply chains. With a JIT system, work-in-process inventory is moved through production stages only when it is needed and in the necessary quantities, making easier to respond to changes in demand, improving production flexibility, reducing inventory costs (Matson and Matson 2007) and also reducing raw materials inventories (Biggart and Gargeya 2002). However, in the automotive supply chain, a trade-off could emerge from the lean, green and resilient philosophy by the adoption of the JIT.…”

How do supply chain management and information systems practices influence operational performance? Evidence from emerging country SMEs

“…Likewise, deploying any SCM or IS practice requires appropriate supplier/vendor support in which the lack of this support is likely to decrease operational performance of IS users and also adoption of JIT practices by buyers (Matson and Matson, 2007).…”

The longer and heavier vehicle debate: A review of empirical evidence from Germany

“…Nevertheless, modern supply chain systems, which today's logistics operations support, have developed and matured so that through practices such as freight consolidation as well as the concentration of production onto fewer sites to reap economies of scale, which tend to characterise modern supply chain systems, the demand for LHVs is becoming more and more apparent, thus challenging McKinnon's (2010) perspective. In particular, the adoption of vertical and horizontal forms of collaboration in logistics among logistics providing competitors, and/or between customers suppliers of products that use logistics services can be an important enabler of better vehicle utilization and economies of scale in transportation (Mason et al 2007, Matson & Matson, 2007, thus further justifying the call for LHV.…”