Just‐in‐Time Evidence‐Based E‐mail “Reminders” in Home Health Care: Impact on Patient Outcomes

Feldman, Penny Hollander; Murtaugh, Christopher M.; Pezzin, Liliana E.; McDonald, Margaret; Peng, Timothy R.

doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00389.x

Cited by 66 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the final exclusion of studies, ten of the studies were excluded for two reasons: uncertainty that the outcomes were measuring research use [28-31], and interventions not explicitly aimed at increasing research use or evidence-based practice [32-37] (Table 2). …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Such clinical systems, computerized decision support, and prompts that support practice (such as decision making algorithms and clinical reminders) can have a positive effect on aligning practices with evidence (110; 114). For example, computerized knowledge management in the form of email reminders has consistently demonstrated significant improvements in provider performance and patient outcomes for patients with heart failure (33) and cancer (71). …”

Section: Climate Embedding Mechanismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Aligning Leadership Across Systems and Organizations to Develop a Strategic Climate for Evidence-Based Practice Implementation

Aarons

Ehrhart²,

Farahnak

et al. 2014

Annu. Rev. Public Health

336

341

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been a growing impetus to bridge the gap between basic science discovery, development of evidence-based practices (EBPs) and their availability and delivery in order to improve public health impact of such practices. In seeking to capitalize on factors that support implementation and sustainment of EBPs, it is important to consider that healthcare is delivered within the outer context of public health systems, and the inner context of healthcare organizations and workgroups. Leaders have a key role in determining the nature of system and organizational context. This article will addresses the role of leadership across levels in developing strategic climate for EBP implementation within the outer (i.e., system) and inner (i.e., organization, work group) contexts of healthcare. Within the framework of Edgar Schein’s “climate embedding mechanisms,” we describe strategies that leaders at the system, organization, and work group levels can consider and apply to develop a strategic climates that support the implementation and sustainment of EBP in healthcare and allied healthcare settings.

show abstract

“…Feldman et al [161] To compare the impact and cost-effectiveness of two information-based provider reminder interventions designed to improve self-care management and outcomes 628 NS E-mail to the patient's nurse highlighting 6 HF-specific clinical recommendations (basic) or initial nurse reminder with additional clinician and patient resources (augmented) or usual care 6.4 KCCQ; EQ-5D Improved QoL (KCCQ) with both interventions compared to usual care (P r 0.05). Basic intervention also yielded a higher EuroQoL score relative to usual care (P r 0.05).…”

Section: Surgical/procedural Trialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of life assessment in heart failure interventions: a 10-year (1996–2005) review

Morgan

McGee

Shelley

2007

European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increasing prevalence and poor prognosis associated with heart failure have prompted research to focus on improving quality of life (QoL) for heart failure patients. Research from 1996–2005 was systematically reviewed to identify randomized controlled trials that assessed QoL in heart failure. In 120 studies, 44 were medication trials; 19 surgical/procedural interventions; and 57 patient care/service delivery interventions. Studies were summarized in terms of aim, population, QoL measures used and QoL findings. Studies used 47 different measures of QoL-generic, health-related, condition-specific, domain-specific and utility measures. Most used a single QoL measure. In 87%, a condition specific QoL measure was used, with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire being the favoured assessment tool. The range of QoL measures in use poses challenges for development of cumulative knowledge. Although comparability across studies is important, this must be informed by the responsiveness of the instrument selected. As carried out in other cardiac groups, comparative evaluations of instrument responsiveness are needed in heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 14:589-607 © 2007 The European Society of Cardiology

show abstract

Just‐in‐Time Evidence‐Based E‐mail “Reminders” in Home Health Care: Impact on Patient Outcomes

Cited by 66 publications

References 27 publications

Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review

Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review

Aligning Leadership Across Systems and Organizations to Develop a Strategic Climate for Evidence-Based Practice Implementation

Quality of life assessment in heart failure interventions: a 10-year (1996–2005) review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About