2022
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0111-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Just breathe: a review of sex and gender in chronic lung disease

Abstract: Chronic lung diseases are the third leading cause of death worldwide and are increasing in prevalence over time. Although much of our traditional understanding of health and disease is derived from study of the male of the species – be it animal or human – there is increasing evidence that sex and gender contribute to differences in disease risk, prevalence, presentation, severity, treatment approach, response and outcomes. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and bronchiectasis represent the most pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 217 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was notable that the majority of studies focused on people with COPD, despite the significant global burden of other respiratory diseases such as asthma, bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis, where exercise intolerance and activity limitation are central features [1,2]. Despite the identification of sex-based differences across the spectrum of chronic airways disease (i.e., higher prevalence of asthma and bronchiectasis and rising incidence of COPD in females) [72], almost two-thirds of the study population were male. In the current era of personalised and precision medicine, a key focus for future research is therefore to quantify activity status using valid research grade objective assessment tools [73] and evaluate PA promotion strategies in more diverse and inclusive populations, with consideration for disease sub-type, severity, comorbid illness, age, sex and ethnicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was notable that the majority of studies focused on people with COPD, despite the significant global burden of other respiratory diseases such as asthma, bronchiectasis and cystic fibrosis, where exercise intolerance and activity limitation are central features [1,2]. Despite the identification of sex-based differences across the spectrum of chronic airways disease (i.e., higher prevalence of asthma and bronchiectasis and rising incidence of COPD in females) [72], almost two-thirds of the study population were male. In the current era of personalised and precision medicine, a key focus for future research is therefore to quantify activity status using valid research grade objective assessment tools [73] and evaluate PA promotion strategies in more diverse and inclusive populations, with consideration for disease sub-type, severity, comorbid illness, age, sex and ethnicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important finding of our study was the association of female sex with lower lung function and higher likelihood of RSP and PRISm, despite accounting for sex-related physiological differences in lung volumes and gender-related confounders. There is growing evidence examining sex differences in CLD [ 27 , 28 ]. However, the burden, phenotype, and risk factors of CLD in female PWH, an understudied population in CLD research, remain unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research string was as follows: (sex[Title] OR gender [Title]) AND (asthma OR COPD), "(("sex"[Title] OR "gender"[Title]) AND ("asthma"[MeSH Terms] OR "asthma"[All Fields] OR "asthmas"[All Fields] OR "asthma s"[All Fields] OR ("pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive"[MeSH Terms] OR ("pulmonary"[All Fields] AND "disease"[All Fields] AND "chronic"[All Fields] AND "obstructive"[All Fields]) OR "chronic obstructive pulmonary disease"[All Fields] OR "copd"[All Fields]))) AND (clinicaltrial[Filter] OR observationalstudy [Filter] OR randomizedcontrolledtri al [Filter])". Citations of previous published reviews and commentaries were checked to select further pertinent studies, if any [6,7,[18][19][20][21][22]. Literature search results were uploaded to Eppi-Reviewer 4 (EPPI-Centre Software.…”
Section: Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%