Jurisdiction in criminal matters in the EU: negative and positive conflicts, and beyond

Abstract

Challenges, Principles and Perspectives (University of Luxembourg-October 2010), which was part of the Panel European Justice as a control of mutual cooperation of EU Member States: the principle of "ne bis in idem" and conflicts of competences as challenges.The author wishes to thank Prof. André Klip and Mrs. Anne-Sophie Massa for their valvable comments on the manuscript. 2 The following abbreviations will be used for the Treaty on the European Union: TEU-A (version introduced by the Treaty of Amsterdam); TEU-N (version introduced by the Treaty of Nice); and TEU-L (version introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon). 3 Article 31 (d) TEU-A: "Common action on judicial cooperation in criminal matters shall include:(…)(d) preventing conflicts of jurisdiction between Member States". 4 Article 29 TEU-A: "(…) the Union's objective shall be to provide citizens with a high level of safety within an area of freedom, security and justice by developing common action among the Member States in the fields of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (…)".

Negatives Strafrecht: Eine Kritik des Sicherheitsstrafrechts – Strafrecht in der KritV von 1986 bis 2011 –

“…Legislative, Exekutive und Judikative: Nur gemeinsam könnten sie das Justizsystem ändern! Caeiro 2010 -Jurisdiction in criminal matters in the EU: negative and positive conflicts, and beyond: 193 Strafrechtsprinzipien und Rechtsstaatlichkeit seien die Stichworte, die beim Abbau von Kompetenzkonflikten zu beachten seien.…”