Tectonics of the Southern Central Andes 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-77353-2_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Jurassic Cretaceous Palaeogeographic Evolution of the Chilean Andes at 23°–24°S Latitude and 34°–35°S Latitude: A Comparative Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From 308S southwards the distribution of the marine deposits accumulated during the second stage forms two clearly separated depositional areas: one in the Coastal Cordillera, and the other in the Principal Cordillera, and mostly on its eastern side (Charrier 1984;Charrier & Mun ˜oz 1994;Charrier et al 2007). The two basins are separated from each other by a volcanic domain that we propose to name the Lo Prado volcanic arc.…”
Section: Second Stage (Kimmeridgian -Albian)mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From 308S southwards the distribution of the marine deposits accumulated during the second stage forms two clearly separated depositional areas: one in the Coastal Cordillera, and the other in the Principal Cordillera, and mostly on its eastern side (Charrier 1984;Charrier & Mun ˜oz 1994;Charrier et al 2007). The two basins are separated from each other by a volcanic domain that we propose to name the Lo Prado volcanic arc.…”
Section: Second Stage (Kimmeridgian -Albian)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…At the end of the first Andean stage, a major plate reorganization associated with a great increase in generation of oceanic crust in the proto-Pacific (Larson 1991) and rapid westward drift of South America modified the tectonic conditions in the continental margin of South America. This geodynamic event, known as the Peruvian orogeny (Steinmann 1929; see also Groeber 1951;Charrier & Vicente 1972;Vicente et al 1973;Ramos 1988bRamos , 2010Reutter 2001;Tunik et al 2010), caused along western South America uplift of the continental margin, the marine regression referred above and definite emersion in the backarc basin, compressive deformation of the existing units, and crustal thickening. As a result of this phase, the first Andean mountain range was formed.…”
Section: Second Stage (Kimmeridgian -Albian)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Pacific Chilean margin, Å berg et al (1984) postulate the existence of an aborted marginal basin generated as the outcome of that tectonic regime, whereas Charrier and Muñoz (1994) and Vergara et al (1995) propose an intra-arc basin. Volcanic rocks dominate in the central part of the basin (Veta Negra Formation), whereas sedimentary rocks predominate to the north (the Arqueros Formation) and south (Å berg et al, 1984) of the basin.…”
Section: Tectonic Setting and Conditions Of Emplacement Of The Lower mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An ensialic marginal basin or intra-arc subsiding basin formed by extension and progressive crustal attenuation has been proposed as the setting for the Lower Cretaceous in central Chile (Levi and Aguirre, 1981;Levi and Nyström, 1982;Å berg et al, 1984;Charrier and Muñoz, 1994;Vergara et al, 1995). This geodynamic setting, which differs from that of modern Andean magmatism, accounts for the unique geochemical characteristics of Lower Cretaceous volcanism in the Coastal Range (Vergara et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%