Jumps Across an Outgoing Spherical Shock Wave Front

Abstract

The shock jump conditions have been used since Rankine published in 1870 and Hugoniot in 1889. However, these conditions, in which the geometrical effect is never included, may not be correctly applied to material responses caused by a spherical wave front. Here, a geometrical effect on jumps in radial particle velocity and radial stress across an outgoing spherical wave front is examined. Two types of jump equations are derived from the conservation laws of mass and momentum. The first equations of Rankine–Hugoniot (RH) type show that the geometrical effect may be neglected at distances of movement of the rear of the wave front that are more than ten times as long as the effective wave front thickness. Furthermore, using four conditions required to satisfy the RH jump conditions, which are contained in the RH type equations, a method is developed to judge the applicability of the RH jump conditions to the jumps. The second type equations for spherical wave fronts of general form are obtained by expressing a volumetric strain wave ε in the wave front by more general wave forms. In the neighborhood of the center of the wave front, for ε<0.09, radial particle velocity in the jump in any materials is inversely proportional to the square of a dimensionless distance from the center to the rear, and for ε<0.04, radial stress in the jump in some viscous fluids and solids is inversely proportional to the distance. In conclusion, an outgoing spherical wave front attenuates greatly near the center due to the geometrical effect as well as rarefaction waves overtaking from behind, while the geometrical effect is negligible at the specified positions that are distant from the center.

Energetic Material Detonation Characterization: A Laboratory‐Scale Approach

“…As previously mentioned, the conservation equations developed are written for the case of a planar shock wave interaction. However, previous research has demonstrated that the radial divergence effects associated with spherical detonation waves are insignificant for shock wave curvatures that are orders-of-magnitude larger than the detonation-reaction-zone thickness [12,[14][15][16]. Thus, the planar equations are valid for the present explosive charge configuration.…”

“…Previous research has shown that, for most materials, a linear relationship exists between the shock wave and particle velocities, or the U-u Hugoniot [2]. The linear rela- tionship is composed of two empirically measured coefficients: C 0 , defined as the bulk sound speed and s, corresponding to the U-u Hugoniot slope, Equation (12). The Uu Hugoniot coefficients for air are well established from previous research by Deal who conducted plate impact experiments using explosively driven flyer plates [11].…”

“…Centrally initiated laboratory-scale spherical charges having short reaction zones are chosen to eliminate both divergence and critical diameter effects associated with energetic-material detonations [12][13][14][15]. As previously mentioned, the conservation equations developed are written for the case of a planar shock wave interaction.…”